Bug 154407 - [PATCH] per package arch spec in kickstart %packages broken
[PATCH] per package arch spec in kickstart %packages broken
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 4
Classification: Red Hat
Component: anaconda (Show other bugs)
4.0
All Linux
medium Severity medium
: ---
: ---
Assigned To: Anaconda Maintenance Team
Mike McLean
:
Depends On:
Blocks:
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2005-04-11 11:15 EDT by David Lehman
Modified: 2007-11-30 17:07 EST (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version: RHBA-2005-220
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2005-06-09 07:29:54 EDT
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---


Attachments (Terms of Use)
Patch from Issue Tracker ticket (2.93 KB, patch)
2005-04-11 11:15 EDT, David Lehman
no flags Details | Diff

  None (edit)
Description David Lehman 2005-04-11 11:15:45 EDT
Description of problem:
specifying architecture of a given package generates errors saying, eg: package
zlib.i386 does not exist.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
anaconda-10.1.1.13-1

How reproducible:
Always on multilib systems.

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Specify "Compatibility Arch Support" but not "Compatibility Arch Development
Support" comps in a kickstart config.
2. Explicitly specify a multilib devel package, eg: 'zlib-devel.i386' on x86_64
3. Run the kickstart
  
Actual results:
"You have specified that the "
"package 'zlib-devel.i386' should be installed.  "
"This package does not exist. "
"Would you like to continue or "
"abort your installation?"

Expected results:
Successful installation of i386 zlib-devel package.

Additional info:
Comment 1 David Lehman 2005-04-11 11:15:45 EDT
Created attachment 112949 [details]
Patch from Issue Tracker ticket
Comment 2 Paul Nasrat 2005-04-11 11:28:31 EDT
This is already commited (as of this morning) to the rhel4 branch of anaconda -
is this a candidate for U1 still or U2?
Comment 3 Tim Powers 2005-06-09 07:29:54 EDT
An advisory has been issued which should help the problem
described in this bug report. This report is therefore being
closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information
on the solution and/or where to find the updated files,
please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report
if the solution does not work for you.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2005-220.html

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.