Bug 154644 – 'strace64 date' segfaults

Bugzilla will be upgraded to version 5.0. The upgrade date is tentatively scheduled for 2 December 2018, pending final testing and feedback.

Bug 154644 - 'strace64 date' segfaults

Summary:	'strace64 date' segfaults

Status:	CLOSED WONTFIX

Aliases:	None

Product:	Red Hat Enterprise Linux 4
Classification:	Red Hat
Component:	strace (Show other bugs)
Sub Component:
Version:	4.0
Hardware:	powerpc Linux

Priority	medium Severity medium
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Assigned To:	Roland McGrath
QA Contact:	Brian Brock
Docs Contact:

URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Depends On:
Blocks:
	Show dependency tree / graph

Reported:	2005-04-13 06:12 EDT by Jay Turner
Modified:	2015-01-07 19:09 EST (History)
CC List:	2 users (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points:	---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed:	2006-01-12 05:21:08 EST
Type:	---
Regression:	---
Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---

Attachments	(Terms of Use)
'strace64 strace64 date' output (59.77 KB, text/plain) 2005-04-13 06:12 EDT, Jay Turner	no flags	Details
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Groups: None (edit)

Description Jay Turner 2005-04-13 06:12:13 EDT

Description of problem:
With both 4.5.8-1 and 4.5.9-2.EL4 I'm seeing 'strace64 date' segfault.  'strace
date' completes successfully.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:


Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.
  
Actual results:


Expected results:


Additional info:

Comment 1 Jay Turner 2005-04-13 06:12:13 EDT

Created attachment 113086 [details]
'strace64 strace64 date' output

Comment 2 Roland McGrath 2005-04-21 16:54:26 EDT

Has this ever worked?  date is a 32-bit binary, right?

Comment 3 Jay Turner 2005-04-25 04:03:53 EDT

Yes, 'date' is a 32-bit binary:

# file `which date`
/bin/date: ELF 32-bit MSB executable, PowerPC or cisco 4500, version 1 (SYSV),
for GNU/Linux 2.2.5, dynamically linked (uses shared libs), stripped

I labelled it 'not a regression' during testing, so I'm not sure that it's ever
worked, but maybe something to look into.

Comment 4 Dmitry V. Levin 2006-01-06 18:01:17 EST

It looks like another illustration for the problem I described in RH#173050.

Comment 5 Roland McGrath 2006-01-12 05:21:08 EST

ppc32 strace does not handle ppc64 binaries and ppc64 strace does not handle
ppc32 binaries.  That's why there is an strace64 rpm on ppc64, so you can use
strace64 for 64-bit binaries and strace for 32-bit binaries.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.