Bug 155164 - ipv6calc spec file cleanup and macrofying
ipv6calc spec file cleanup and macrofying
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: ipv6calc (Show other bugs)
rawhide
All Linux
medium Severity medium
: ---
: ---
Assigned To: Radek Vokal
: EasyFix
Depends On:
Blocks:
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2005-04-17 08:35 EDT by Robert Scheck
Modified: 2007-11-30 17:11 EST (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2005-04-19 04:56:21 EDT
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---


Attachments (Terms of Use)
Diff of ipv6calc spec files (3.40 KB, patch)
2005-04-17 08:36 EDT, Robert Scheck
no flags Details | Diff

  None (edit)
Description Robert Scheck 2005-04-17 08:35:05 EDT
Description of problem:
ipv6calc spec file should get some cleanups and better rpm macrofying 
including the use of %check, %docdir for example. Directories also should
be owned correctly by the package.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
ipv6calc-0.48-4

Actual results / Expected results:
Apply of the patch or even better ;-)
Comment 1 Robert Scheck 2005-04-17 08:36:38 EDT
Created attachment 113287 [details]
Diff of ipv6calc spec files
Comment 2 Radek Vokal 2005-04-19 04:56:21 EDT
Checked in, thanks
Comment 3 Robert Scheck 2005-04-19 05:04:49 EDT
Btw, http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/ipv6calc/ doesn't exist. Why? Is 
it possible to change it?! :)
Comment 4 Radek Vokal 2006-06-26 06:35:00 EDT
I'm sorry but the link is valid .. What are you pointing at?
Comment 5 Robert Scheck 2006-06-26 06:40:23 EDT
Ehm? When I wrote comment #3 more than a year ago, in fact, it wasn't valid.
But why are we using an old and successfully closed bug report?
Comment 6 Peter Bieringer 2006-06-26 06:43:36 EDT
I cc'ed me to check, whether spec file enhancements should be (or were already)
done also in vanilla source (where I also distribute a spec file) - no rumours ;-)
Comment 7 Radek Vokal 2006-06-26 07:09:35 EDT
Ah, my fault :) I've just received notification from bugzilla a read the very
last comment ... 

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.