Bug 155315 - unsigned package apmd-3.2.2-2.i386.rpm
unsigned package apmd-3.2.2-2.i386.rpm
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: yum (Show other bugs)
i686 Linux
medium Severity medium
: ---
: ---
Assigned To: Jeremy Katz
Depends On:
  Show dependency treegraph
Reported: 2005-04-18 23:47 EDT by Peter Ennis
Modified: 2014-01-21 17:51 EST (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Last Closed: 2005-06-13 18:12:06 EDT
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---

Attachments (Terms of Use)

  None (edit)
Description Peter Ennis 2005-04-18 23:47:53 EDT
Description of problem:

  Install: sqlite-devel.i386 0:3.1.2-3 - development
Total download size: 533 M
Is this ok [y/N]: y
Downloading Packages:
(1/4): glibc-kernheaders- 100% |=========================| 705 kB    00:20
(2/4): fonts-xorg-100dpi- 100% |=========================| 4.2 MB    02:26
(3/4): libgnomecups-0.2.0 100% |=========================|  70 kB    00:01
(4/4): libgcj-devel-4.0.0 100% |=========================| 1.0 MB    00:35
unsigned package apmd-3.2.2-2.i386.rpm
[root@lfs Desktop]#

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

How reproducible:
yum update

Steps to Reproduce:
Actual results:

Expected results:

Additional info:
Comment 1 Peter Ennis 2005-04-20 00:44:40 EDT
Testing of 4/19/2005 after successful updates of
other rpms:

Install: python-elementtree.i386 0:1.2.6-4 - development
  Install: sqlite-devel.i386 0:3.1.2-3 - development
Total download size: 539 M
Is this ok [y/N]: y
Downloading Packages:
unsigned package apmd-3.2.2-2.i386.rpm
[root@lfs Desktop]#
Comment 2 Marius Andreiana 2005-04-21 12:04:32 EDT
This is normal for development, not all packages are signed (I don't know why).
Please specify
in /etc/yum* (conf, repos)
Comment 3 Peter Ennis 2005-04-21 12:34:30 EDT
This is a work around.
I am in full support of the fedora moves to improve
security with gpg so setting gpgcheck=0 rather
defeats this purpose.
This bug will therefore be noted by me as a known "feature" that
is expected to be deprecated in the official release :-)
Comment 4 Jeremy Katz 2005-06-13 18:12:06 EDT
Packages in the development tree are regularly not signed and this is not a bug.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.