Bug 155315 - unsigned package apmd-3.2.2-2.i386.rpm
Summary: unsigned package apmd-3.2.2-2.i386.rpm
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED NOTABUG
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: yum
Version: 4
Hardware: i686
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Jeremy Katz
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2005-04-19 03:47 UTC by Peter Ennis
Modified: 2014-01-21 22:51 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2005-06-13 22:12:06 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Peter Ennis 2005-04-19 03:47:53 UTC
Description of problem:

  Install: sqlite-devel.i386 0:3.1.2-3 - development
Total download size: 533 M
Is this ok [y/N]: y
Downloading Packages:
(1/4): glibc-kernheaders- 100% |=========================| 705 kB    00:20
(2/4): fonts-xorg-100dpi- 100% |=========================| 4.2 MB    02:26
(3/4): libgnomecups-0.2.0 100% |=========================|  70 kB    00:01
(4/4): libgcj-devel-4.0.0 100% |=========================| 1.0 MB    00:35
unsigned package apmd-3.2.2-2.i386.rpm
[root@lfs Desktop]#

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:
yum update

Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.
  
Actual results:


Expected results:


Additional info:

Comment 1 Peter Ennis 2005-04-20 04:44:40 UTC
Testing of 4/19/2005 after successful updates of
other rpms:

Install: python-elementtree.i386 0:1.2.6-4 - development
  Install: sqlite-devel.i386 0:3.1.2-3 - development
Total download size: 539 M
Is this ok [y/N]: y
Downloading Packages:
unsigned package apmd-3.2.2-2.i386.rpm
[root@lfs Desktop]#

Comment 2 Marius Andreiana 2005-04-21 16:04:32 UTC
This is normal for development, not all packages are signed (I don't know why).
Please specify
gpgcheck=0
in /etc/yum* (conf, repos)


Comment 3 Peter Ennis 2005-04-21 16:34:30 UTC
This is a work around.
I am in full support of the fedora moves to improve
security with gpg so setting gpgcheck=0 rather
defeats this purpose.
This bug will therefore be noted by me as a known "feature" that
is expected to be deprecated in the official release :-)


Comment 4 Jeremy Katz 2005-06-13 22:12:06 UTC
Packages in the development tree are regularly not signed and this is not a bug.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.