Bug 1556261 - python-rdflib: FTBFS in F28
Summary: python-rdflib: FTBFS in F28
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED NOTABUG
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: python-rdflib
Version: 28
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Dave Malcolm
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: F28FTBFS
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2018-03-14 23:32 UTC by Fedora Release Engineering
Modified: 2018-03-15 06:31 UTC (History)
4 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2018-03-15 06:31:29 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Fedora Release Engineering 2018-03-14 23:32:32 UTC
Your package python-rdflib failed to build from source in current F28.

https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=24880849

For details on mass rebuild see https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_28_Mass_Rebuild

Comment 1 Dan Callaghan 2018-03-15 06:25:27 UTC
Logs are missing in Koji so it's a bit hard to see what went wrong... It builds locally for me in mock, although with a large number of test failures that are then suppressed...

Comment 2 Dan Callaghan 2018-03-15 06:29:25 UTC
Hmm okay. The failed build was:

python-rdflib-4.2.1-4.fc28

Then the test failures were suppressed:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-rdflib/c/7fe1b1a7d492a1c48e30eb75d9a8d918f0f809dc

and there was a successful build:

python-rdflib-4.2.1-5.fc28

but that build is tagged f29, not f28, in spite of its dist tag. 🤔 Not sure how that happened.

Comment 3 Dan Callaghan 2018-03-15 06:31:29 UTC
But anyway, it seems we still have python-rdflib-4.2.1-2.fc26 in Fedora 28 right now, which is the same code. And we have successful builds on the f28 branch (in case it needs any fixes during Fedora 28 release cycle). So I don't think there is anything else we need to do here.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.