Bug 156247 - FC4 rebuild failed
Summary: FC4 rebuild failed
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: udftools
Version: rawhide
Hardware: i386
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Matthias Saou
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2005-04-28 13:22 UTC by Michael Schwendt
Modified: 2007-11-30 22:11 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2005-05-03 13:34:29 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Michael Schwendt 2005-04-28 13:22:28 UTC
This package failed to rebuild for FC4 Development around 2005-04-11 after an
automated release bump.

Build failure logs at: http://fedoraproject.org/extras/development/build-logs/

Comment 1 Michael Schwendt 2005-04-28 13:22:53 UTC
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?group_id=295&atid=100295


Comment 2 Matthias Saou 2005-05-03 13:34:29 UTC
I've included two new patches from the Debian package to fix this build issue.

Comment 3 Peter Bieringer 2005-10-20 10:30:26 UTC
It's not related to Fedora Core, but I don't know how to file a feature
(package) request on RHEL4:

Is it possible that udftools would be also pushed into RHEL4 (extra). I use now
here the rebuilded SRPMS from FC4, looks like working. Or are there any other
hints available how to use DVD-RAM on RHEL4 with filesystem UDF?
BTW: neither dag nor dries RPM archive provide udftools at all.

Comment 4 Matthias Saou 2005-10-20 10:45:20 UTC
I could push udftools into rpmforge in order to at least get binary builds for
RHEL4 (totally unofficial and unsupported of course), as there is no equivalent
of Fedora Extras in the RHEL world : The RHEL Extras seem to consist only of
packages whose licenses made them stay apart (ipw2x00 firmwares, flash browser
plugin, java runtime...).

Comment 5 Peter Bieringer 2005-10-20 10:53:55 UTC
Getting this package via dag or dries additional repositories would be very good
for the moment. Perhaps you can notify RHEL team that udftools should be
included in upcoming RHEL4 U3 because it would be common used in the future for
backup on DVD-RAM for sure.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.