Bug 156925 - rhpl should buildrequire wireless-tools and some minor spec file changes
rhpl should buildrequire wireless-tools and some minor spec file changes
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: rhpl (Show other bugs)
rawhide
All Linux
medium Severity medium
: ---
: ---
Assigned To: Anaconda Maintenance Team
:
Depends On:
Blocks:
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2005-05-05 09:43 EDT by Robert Scheck
Modified: 2008-05-01 11:38 EDT (History)
0 users

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2005-05-05 17:53:55 EDT
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---


Attachments (Terms of Use)
Diff of rhpl spec files (1.24 KB, patch)
2005-05-05 09:46 EDT, Robert Scheck
no flags Details | Diff

  None (edit)
Description Robert Scheck 2005-05-05 09:43:26 EDT
Description of problem:
rhpl should buildrequire wireless-tools and some minor spec file changes.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
rhpl-0.161-1

How reproducible:
rpm -e --nodeps wireless-tools
Try to rebuild rhpl-0.161-1 - will fail.

Actual results:
- No build requirement to wireless-tools if not on s390 (where ethtool isn't 
  built currently)
- Python >= xyz is manually required, but rpm >= 4.4 is able to detect python 
  abi version itself
- "Red Hat Linux" in summary and description, but we've got "Fedora Core" ;-)

Expected results:
Apply of the suggested changes like in the attached patch or even better ;-)
Comment 1 Robert Scheck 2005-05-05 09:46:34 EDT
Created attachment 114054 [details]
Diff of rhpl spec files

For verifiying RPM's automatical detection of python abi requirement, do:

> rpm -q --requires rhpl | grep abi
python(abi) = 2.4
>
Comment 2 Jeremy Katz 2005-05-05 17:53:55 EDT
Committed similar to CVS, will be in 0.163 or later.  The python-abi thing is
from after I added the stuff to the spec file :-)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.