Bug 157327 - ip.sh ignores SLAVE flag when looking for interfaces
ip.sh ignores SLAVE flag when looking for interfaces
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Product: Red Hat Cluster Suite
Classification: Red Hat
Component: rgmanager (Show other bugs)
4
All Linux
medium Severity medium
: ---
: ---
Assigned To: Lon Hohberger
Cluster QE
:
Depends On:
Blocks:
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2005-05-10 13:26 EDT by Lon Hohberger
Modified: 2009-04-16 16:17 EDT (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version: RHBA-2005-738
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2005-10-07 12:51:47 EDT
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---


Attachments (Terms of Use)
Fixes bug (1.08 KB, patch)
2005-07-12 12:13 EDT, Lon Hohberger
no flags Details | Diff

  None (edit)
Description Lon Hohberger 2005-05-10 13:26:13 EDT
Description of problem:

ip.sh will ignore the SLAVE flag when searching for an interface to bind the IP
address to.  This causes a slave interface to receive the IP instead of the
master (bonded) interface.

This is not reproducible on 2-NIC configurations, but has been reproduced on
6+NIC configurations.

In order for this to happen, the <bond> interface must be set up after the
physical (slave) interfaces.
Comment 1 Lon Hohberger 2005-05-10 13:27:25 EDT
Correction: this has not been reproduced on 2-NIC configurations, but has been
produced on 6+NIC configurations externally.
Comment 2 Lon Hohberger 2005-07-12 12:13:26 EDT
Created attachment 116663 [details]
Fixes bug
Comment 3 Lon Hohberger 2005-07-12 12:14:58 EDT
Fixes in CVS.  Setting to MODIFIED
Comment 5 Red Hat Bugzilla 2005-10-07 12:51:47 EDT
An advisory has been issued which should help the problem
described in this bug report. This report is therefore being
closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information
on the solution and/or where to find the updated files,
please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report
if the solution does not work for you.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2005-738.html

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.