Bug 157590 - [RFE] please keep clamav up-to-date
[RFE] please keep clamav up-to-date
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: clamav (Show other bugs)
rawhide
All Linux
medium Severity medium
: ---
: ---
Assigned To: Enrico Scholz
Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
http://clamav.net/stable.php#pagestart
: FutureFeature
Depends On:
Blocks:
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2005-05-12 18:18 EDT by shrek-m
Modified: 2007-11-30 17:11 EST (History)
0 users

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Enhancement
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2005-05-16 15:34:36 EDT
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---


Attachments (Terms of Use)

  None (edit)
Description shrek-m 2005-05-12 18:18:19 EDT
From Bugzilla Helper:
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.7) Gecko/20050417 Fedora/1.7.7-1.3.1

Description of problem:
http://clamav.net/stable.php#pagestart
clamav 0.85 released (Wed, 11 May 2005 18:28:59 GMT)

FC3-extras has 0.71-2

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
0.83-2

How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
clamav is outdated

Additional info:
Comment 1 shrek-m 2005-05-12 18:29:53 EDT
i can not understand why you are splitting clamav in such a lot of packages.
why not only eg.
clamav (including freshclam, clamd, etc)
and clamav-milter

$ yum -d0 list clamav*
Installed Packages
clamav.ppc                               0.83-2                 installed
clamav-data.ppc                          0.83-2                 installed
clamav-devel.ppc                         0.83-2                 installed
clamav-lib.ppc                           0.83-2                 installed
clamav-milter.ppc                        0.83-2                 installed
clamav-server.ppc                        0.83-2                 installed
clamav-update.ppc                        0.83-2                 installed
Comment 2 Warren Togami 2005-05-14 04:48:45 EDT
Enrico mind if I checkin 0.85 to FC4 Extras?  Since it is still rawhide-like
risk is minimal.

What do I do about that CVS comment stuff at the top of your spec?

I'm testing the RPM rebuilt with 0.85 sources on FC2.  Other people should test
it on other dists.  If all signs are positive we can push it on FC1-FC4 Extras. 
Comment 3 Enrico Scholz 2005-05-14 05:02:20 EDT
at comment #1:
--------------

please read http://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=268#c13; most of the
questions about clamav packaging are already answered in fedora.us bugzilla ;)

at comment #2:
--------------

just requested build of 0.85 for testing

What do you mean with 'CVS comment stuff'?
Comment 4 Warren Togami 2005-05-14 05:04:32 EDT
fedora.us pending repository FC1 and FC2 have 0.85 binaries now.  Please test
those if you are running those distributions.
Comment 5 shrek-m 2005-05-16 15:34:36 EDT
thanks, 0.85 is in extras/development.

i never heard before
  fedora-usermgmt
  fedora-usermgmt-setup
  fedora-usermgmt-shadow
which are installed for dependencies.
in the last few years all packages were satsified with shadow-utils.

`yum remove fedora-usermgmt*`  did the trick.
oops, clamav* was removed too ;-)

sorry enrico, i guess your packages are not for me.
imho something is going wrong here.
Comment 6 Warren Togami 2005-05-16 15:37:02 EDT
Not "wrong", but "different".  fedora-usermgmt is an alternative way of handling
system users.  The way used by other packages is fragile and wrong.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.