Bug 158722 - bluetooth initscript should start erlier
bluetooth initscript should start erlier
Status: CLOSED WONTFIX
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 4
Classification: Red Hat
Component: bluez-utils (Show other bugs)
4.0
i386 Linux
medium Severity low
: ---
: ---
Assigned To: Ric Wheeler
:
Depends On:
Blocks:
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2005-05-25 04:01 EDT by Hans-Gerd van Schelve
Modified: 2012-06-20 09:31 EDT (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2012-06-20 09:31:30 EDT
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---


Attachments (Terms of Use)

  None (edit)
Description Hans-Gerd van Schelve 2005-05-25 04:01:36 EDT
From Bugzilla Helper:
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; de-DE; rv:1.7.8) Gecko/20050512 Red Hat/1.0.4-1.4.1 Firefox/1.0.4

Description of problem:
During init the bluetooth start script ist calling at step S25bluetooth. We are using bluetooth phones for our netwrok connection so we need start of bluetooth erlier than network. Our suggestion is to start bluetooth on position S07bluetooth. 

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. install bluez-utils
2. chkconfig bluetooth on
3. ls -l /etc/rc5.d/S*

Additional info:
Comment 1 David Woodhouse 2006-09-10 04:39:19 EDT
Unfortunately we're also constrained by the use of dbus -- we have to start
bluetooth after dbus is running.

What's the failure mode? You're using dialup over rfcomm? Doesn't the ppp just
keep failing until the /dev/rfcommX device exists, and then manage to start
correctly after that?
Comment 3 Jiri Pallich 2012-06-20 09:31:30 EDT
Thank you for submitting this issue for consideration in Red Hat Enterprise Linux. The release for which you requested us to review is now End of Life. 
Please See https://access.redhat.com/support/policy/updates/errata/

If you would like Red Hat to re-consider your feature request for an active release, please re-open the request via appropriate support channels and provide additional supporting details about the importance of this issue.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.