Bug 158972 - make build TARGET=<wrong branch> succeeds
make build TARGET=<wrong branch> succeeds
Product: Fedora Infrastructure
Classification: Retired
Component: extras buildsys (Show other bugs)
All Linux
medium Severity high
: ---
: ---
Assigned To: Seth Vidal
Jeremy Katz
Depends On:
  Show dependency treegraph
Reported: 2005-05-27 07:58 EDT by Ralf Corsepius
Modified: 2007-04-18 13:27 EDT (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Last Closed: 2005-07-29 15:32:31 EDT
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---

Attachments (Terms of Use)

  None (edit)
Description Ralf Corsepius 2005-05-27 07:58:17 EDT
From Bugzilla Helper:
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.8) Gecko/20050513 Fedora/1.7.8-1.3.1

Description of problem:
in a checked-out copy of FE's devel CVS
make build TARGET=FC3 produces fc3 rpms

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

How reproducible:
Didn't try

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Check out a package on FE CVS "devel"
2. Run
make build TARGET=FC3

Actual Results:  The build system built packages for fc3 from devel sources and pushed them to "needsign". I.e. there now exist packages in needsign, which do not have a nominal CVS repository and on which the build-requestor doesn't have any control over (I can't withdraw them.)

Expected Results:  1. The build system should have refused to build the package.

2. The build system should not have moved the build result to "needsign"

3. The build-requestor should have means for build-requestors to withdraw built/release candidate packages/rpms.

Additional info:

This case has happend and requires adminstrator action.

C.f. https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-extras-commits/2005-May/msg02166.html
Comment 1 Jeremy Katz 2005-05-27 08:35:26 EDT
Changed the build target to always pull where it builds from the branches file;
really probably should have done that as soon as we were comfortable with how
things were going.

This should at least make 1 and 2 much less of a problem.  3 is probably still
something to consider as part of the xml-rpc work.
Comment 2 Jeremy Katz 2005-07-29 15:32:31 EDT
You can nuke packages now using plague-client

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.