Bug 159546 - Packages count for Solaris systems in SystemList incorrect
Summary: Packages count for Solaris systems in SystemList incorrect
Status: CLOSED WONTFIX
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Satellite 5
Classification: Red Hat
Component: Solaris (Show other bugs)
(Show other bugs)
Version: 500
Hardware: All Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Sayli Karmarkar
QA Contact: Red Hat Satellite QA List
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
: 170726 (view as bug list)
Depends On:
Blocks: 471641
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2005-06-03 21:25 UTC by Ken Ganong
Modified: 2011-06-20 19:55 UTC (History)
4 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Enhancement
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2011-06-20 19:55:34 UTC
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---


Attachments (Terms of Use)
A suggestion for how the updates column could be made clearer with icons in the system list (400.22 KB, image/png)
2005-07-08 18:07 UTC, Máirín Duffy
no flags Details

Description Ken Ganong 2005-06-03 21:25:30 UTC
This package count appears to include patches and patch sets.  I'm not sure if
that's the cause of the problem, but I do know the count is incorrect.

Comment 1 Bret McMillan 2005-06-07 16:43:52 UTC
Robin, close this if it's not a bug.

Comment 2 Robin Norwood 2005-06-30 14:58:26 UTC
There is ongoing debate about how to handle this.  Stay tuned.

Comment 3 Robin Norwood 2005-07-01 14:22:20 UTC
It sounds like this is the plan:

Change the 'Errata' and 'Packages' columns to a single 'Updates' column.

For linux systems, the format will be: packages/errata

For a solaris system: Packages/Patches/Patch Sets

Also, provide a tooltip for each link explaining what it is linking to.

Comment 4 Robin Norwood 2005-07-06 23:14:36 UTC
bumping to rhn410

Comment 5 Máirín Duffy 2005-07-08 18:07:38 UTC
Created attachment 116527 [details]
A suggestion for how the updates column could be made clearer with icons in the system list

Comment 6 Max Spevack 2005-07-27 20:37:51 UTC
new Sol component created/QA contact should be mspevack if not already

Comment 7 Olivier Renault 2006-01-10 17:19:48 UTC
Máirín, could it also display a exclamation mark in the column status ?

Comment 8 Máirín Duffy 2006-01-10 17:30:39 UTC
(In reply to comment #7)
> Máirín, could it also display a exclamation mark in the column status ?

Hi Oliver, I don't think an exclamation mark in the status column would be
appropriate if there are patches or patch sets available for a Solaris system
since this is commonly a desired state. However, I agree that the mockup in
comment 5 is misleading in that the Linux systems that have packages/errata
available should have an exclamation mark displayed.

Comment 9 Máirín Duffy 2006-01-13 16:40:54 UTC
*** Bug 170726 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 11 Robin Norwood 2006-10-17 16:35:44 UTC
mass reassign to mmccune

Comment 13 Red Hat Bugzilla 2007-04-12 00:15:01 UTC
User bnackash@redhat.com's account has been closed


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.