Bug 161342 - Make filechooser work with bookmarks written by newer GTK+
Summary: Make filechooser work with bookmarks written by newer GTK+
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 4
Classification: Red Hat
Component: gtk2
Version: 4.0
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
: ---
Assignee: Matthias Clasen
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard: RHEL4U3NAK
Depends On:
Blocks: 181409
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2005-06-22 15:30 UTC by Matthias Clasen
Modified: 2007-11-30 22:07 UTC (History)
0 users

Fixed In Version: RHBA-2006-0335
Doc Type: Enhancement
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2006-08-10 21:13:06 UTC
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Attachments (Terms of Use)
the patch (1.81 KB, patch)
2005-06-22 15:30 UTC, Matthias Clasen 		no flags Details | Diff
View All


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHBA-2006:0335 0 normal SHIPPED_LIVE gtk2 bug fix update 2006-08-09 04:00:00 UTC

Description Matthias Clasen 2005-06-22 15:30:40 UTC 
GTK+ 2.8 slightly changes the format in which the file chooser bookmarks are
written. When RHEL5 comes around, we might see people use their home directories
with both 2.4.x (from RHEL4) and GTK+ >= 2.8 (from RHEL5), and in order to 
prevent problems with the file chooser bookmarks in this scenario, a small
patch should be applied to GTK+ to make it handle the new format.

A similar patch will be necessary for the gnome-vfs file chooser backend
in libgnomeui.
Comment 1 Matthias Clasen 2005-06-22 15:30:40 UTC 
Created attachment 115815 [details]
the patch
Comment 10 Matthias Clasen 2006-04-13 12:29:25 UTC 
Patch is included in gtk2-2.4.13-19
Comment 15 Red Hat Bugzilla 2006-08-10 21:13:07 UTC 
An advisory has been issued which should help the problem
described in this bug report. This report is therefore being
closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information
on the solution and/or where to find the updated files,
please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report
if the solution does not work for you.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2006-0335.html
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.