Bug 161345 - [RHEL4] libgnomeui filechooser backend won't understand bookmarks from GTK+ in RHEL 5
[RHEL4] libgnomeui filechooser backend won't understand bookmarks from GTK+ i...
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 4
Classification: Red Hat
Component: libgnomeui (Show other bugs)
All Linux
medium Severity medium
: ---
: ---
Assigned To: Ray Strode [halfline]
: FutureFeature
Depends On:
  Show dependency treegraph
Reported: 2005-06-22 11:51 EDT by Matthias Clasen
Modified: 2007-11-30 17:07 EST (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Enhancement
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Last Closed: 2006-09-05 16:03:55 EDT
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---

Attachments (Terms of Use)
the patch (1.59 KB, patch)
2005-06-22 11:51 EDT, Matthias Clasen
no flags Details | Diff

  None (edit)
Description Matthias Clasen 2005-06-22 11:51:41 EDT
GTK+ 2.8 slightly changes the format in which the file chooser bookmarks are
written. When RHEL5 comes around, we might see people use their home directories
with both 2.4.x (from RHEL4) and GTK+ >= 2.8 (from RHEL5), and in order to 
prevent problems with the file chooser bookmarks in this scenario, a small
patch should be applied to the file chooser backends to make them handle the
new format.

The attached patch make the necessary changes to the gnome-vfs file chooser
backend in libgnomeui.
Comment 1 Matthias Clasen 2005-06-22 11:51:41 EDT
Created attachment 115816 [details]
the patch
Comment 6 Ray Strode [halfline] 2005-10-20 16:04:54 EDT
Patch is here, won't take long to apply...

Comment 11 RHEL Product and Program Management 2006-09-05 15:51:36 EDT
The component this request has been filed against is not planned for inclusion
in the next update. The decision is based on weighting the priority and number
of requests for a component as well as the impact on the Red Hat Enterprise
Linux user-base: other components are considered having higher priority and the
number of changes we intend to include in update cycles is limited.
Comment 12 RHEL Product and Program Management 2006-09-05 16:03:55 EDT
Product Management has reviewed and declined this request.  You may appeal this
decision by reopening this request. 

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.