Bug 1614940
| Summary: | Include ceph-common + dependencies packages in RHV-H base image | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Virtualization Manager | Reporter: | Javier Coscia <jcoscia> |
| Component: | ovirt-host | Assignee: | Sandro Bonazzola <sbonazzo> |
| Status: | CLOSED WONTFIX | QA Contact: | Pavel Stehlik <pstehlik> |
| Severity: | high | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | 4.2.5 | CC: | dfediuck, ebenahar, gwatson, mkalinin, nlevine, tnisan, ykaul, ylavi |
| Target Milestone: | --- | Flags: | lsvaty:
testing_plan_complete-
|
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2018-08-20 07:03:29 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | Node | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
|
Description
Javier Coscia
2018-08-10 19:43:20 UTC
If cephfs is used as POSIX, wouldn't this go through the normal POSIX support in RHV and not require cephfs packages? My understanding of that RFE was CephFS as local storage on hosts through the POSIX API, not CephFS interaction itself, or CephFS tooling. Either way, moving this to ovirt-host as a common dependency tracker for RHV. Yaniv - do we actually want to support CephFS itself on RHV? (In reply to Ryan Barry from comment #1) > If cephfs is used as POSIX, wouldn't this go through the normal POSIX > support in RHV and not require cephfs packages? My understanding of that RFE > was CephFS as local storage on hosts through the POSIX API, not CephFS > interaction itself, or CephFS tooling. > > Either way, moving this to ovirt-host as a common dependency tracker for RHV. > > Yaniv - do we actually want to support CephFS itself on RHV? The Red Hat Storage recommendation is not to use CephFS with RHV currently. I would consulate with them about this. If they approve I assume the customer would need to add the rpms post install to the image. The use case we tested in CephFS as a shared POSIX domain. Yaniv K, can you provide your input? (In reply to Yaniv Lavi from comment #2) > (In reply to Ryan Barry from comment #1) > > If cephfs is used as POSIX, wouldn't this go through the normal POSIX > > support in RHV and not require cephfs packages? My understanding of that RFE > > was CephFS as local storage on hosts through the POSIX API, not CephFS > > interaction itself, or CephFS tooling. > > > > Either way, moving this to ovirt-host as a common dependency tracker for RHV. > > > > Yaniv - do we actually want to support CephFS itself on RHV? > > The Red Hat Storage recommendation is not to use CephFS with RHV currently. > I would consulate with them about this. > If they approve I assume the customer would need to add the rpms post > install to the image. > > The use case we tested in CephFS as a shared POSIX domain. What are the steps to get this working then? It's not very clear from the docs in https://red.ht/2OxNe9w & https://red.ht/2B6Ge1D In the second link, under step 8, we should enter the VFS Type which in this case would be ceph, this would not work if we don't have the bits to mount it (ceph-common) > Yaniv K, can you provide your input? After discussing how to consume Ceph iSCSI and Ceph NFS or CephFS as POSIX FS, we are not going to include ceph-common + dependencies in RHV-H, closing wontfix. |