Bug 1615681 - ipset-service - comments refer to wrong path
Summary: ipset-service - comments refer to wrong path
Keywords:
Status: ASSIGNED
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9
Classification: Red Hat
Component: ipset
Version: 9.1
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
low
Target Milestone: rc
: 9.4
Assignee: Phil Sutter
QA Contact: qe-baseos-daemons
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2018-08-14 03:18 UTC by IanB
Modified: 2023-08-16 14:07 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

Fixed In Version: ipset-6.38-2
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2018-08-17 14:42:23 UTC
Type: Bug
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Issue Tracker RHELPLAN-156031 0 None None None 2023-04-28 11:11:54 UTC

Description IanB 2018-08-14 03:18:21 UTC 
/etc/sysconfig/ipset-config + /usr/libexec/ipset/ipset.start-stop both have comments referring to the old storage location: /etc/ipset/ipset. The comments in these files should be updated to refer to the new location: /etc/sysconfig/ipset or removed to avoid confusion.

Using package ipset-service-6.29-1.el7.noarch
Comment 2 Stefano Brivio 2018-08-17 14:42:23 UTC 
Thanks for reporting. This is fixed in ipset-6.38-2, which will ship with RHEL 7.6.
Comment 3 IanB 2023-04-28 11:11:07 UTC 
This issue is still occurring. I'm using ipset-service-7.11-7.el9_1.noarch and see the old comments.
Comment 7 IanB 2023-04-28 11:27:16 UTC 
To clarify, the old comment is still present in /etc/sysconfig/ipset-config
Comment 8 Stefano Brivio 2023-08-16 06:51:16 UTC 
Gosh, sorry, I missed this -- I don't know how it got assigned to me, I'm not the maintainer anymore, reassigning.
Comment 9 Phil Sutter 2023-08-16 14:07:21 UTC 
Stefano, the ticket was simply reopened. You resolved it back in RHEL7 time (I
guess with the refactoring of ipset.start-stop), but seems you missed the
comment in ipset-config file. FWIW, it is fixed in Fedora Rawhide at least.

As per comment 3, I'm making this a RHEL9.1 issue and aim for a fix in RHEL9.4.
On one hand, RHEL7 is EOL and on the other it is really a minor problem.
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.