Bug 161614 - X-Bugzilla-Reason: Flag change
X-Bugzilla-Reason: Flag change
Product: Bugzilla
Classification: Community
Component: Bugzilla General (Show other bugs)
All Linux
medium Severity medium (vote)
: ---
: ---
Assigned To: PnT DevOps Devs
David Lawrence
: FutureFeature
Depends On:
  Show dependency treegraph
Reported: 2005-06-24 16:23 EDT by Dave Jones
Modified: 2015-01-04 17:20 EST (History)
3 users (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Enhancement
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Last Closed: 2008-12-01 21:18:54 EST
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---

Attachments (Terms of Use)

External Trackers
Tracker ID Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Mozilla Foundation 467859 None None None Never

  None (edit)
Description Dave Jones 2005-06-24 16:23:45 EDT
>Would it be possible to add a X-Bugzilla-Reason: Flag change
>to bugzillamail so these state change mails can just be procmailed away ?
>The vast majority of bugzillamail I get these days consists of
>"PM ACK", and such which creates so much noise, that reading bugzillamail
>has basically become next to worthless for me personally.
Comment 1 David Lawrence 2008-09-16 12:52:53 EDT
Red Hat Bugzilla is now using version 3.2 of the Bugzilla codebase and therefore this bug will need to be re-verified against the new release. With the updated code this bug may no longer be relevant or may have been fixed in the new code.
Updating bug version to 3.2.
Comment 2 Noura El hawary 2008-12-01 21:18:54 EST
now in the bugzilla email headers there are:

X-Bugzilla-Flags: [% flags %] --> that would contain list of all the flags that were changed and the status they were changed to

X-Bugzilla-Reason: [% reasonsheader %] --> would contain a flag change action notification.

Comment 3 Kevin Baker 2008-12-02 13:20:50 EST

is this fix upstream or just a customisation in Red Hat bugzilla?
Comment 4 Noura El hawary 2008-12-03 05:52:53 EST
Hi Kevin,

the X-Bugzilla-Reason: [% reasonsheader %] part is in upstream bugzilla.

but the 

X-Bugzilla-Flags: [% flags %] --> that was a customization requested by bug #470345

Comment 5 Kevin Baker 2008-12-03 09:26:01 EST
Hi Noura,

wouldn't the X-Bugzilla-Flags be useful to the upstream? Any reason why Red Hat should carry this patch?
Comment 6 David Lawrence 2008-12-03 10:45:11 EST
(In reply to comment #5)
> Hi Noura,
> wouldn't the X-Bugzilla-Flags be useful to the upstream? Any reason why Red Hat
> should carry this patch?

I agree. Noura can you file this bug upstream and create a patch against their cvs head that implements the flags header?

Comment 7 Noura El hawary 2008-12-03 20:51:37 EST
okay i have created a bug upstream and attached a patch to their bugzilla to it, basically the upstream patch is different from our patch in one thing which is where we check for flag visibility as upstream bugzilla doesn't have this flag visibility feature yet.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.