Bug 162328 - little change in the rc.sysinit output
little change in the rc.sysinit output
Status: CLOSED WONTFIX
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: initscripts (Show other bugs)
rawhide
All Linux
medium Severity medium
: ---
: ---
Assigned To: Bill Nottingham
Brock Organ
: FutureFeature
Depends On:
Blocks:
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2005-07-02 15:21 EDT by Nadav Kavalerchik
Modified: 2014-03-16 22:54 EDT (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Enhancement
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2005-10-05 15:41:13 EDT
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---


Attachments (Terms of Use)

  None (edit)
Description Nadav Kavalerchik 2005-07-02 15:21:27 EDT
From Bugzilla Helper:
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; Konqueror/3.4; Linux 2.6.11-1.1383_FC5; X11; i686; en_US, he) KHTML/3.4.1 (like Gecko)

Description of problem:
i've changed line 410 in the file /etc/rc.d/init.d/funtions 
from:  echo -n "$STRING "   
to:  echo -n -e "$STRING "  
(added -e param so it can pharse \x codes) 
 
i've changed line 486 in the file /etc/rc.d/rc.sysinit 
from: action $"Mounting local filesystems: " mount -a -t nonfs,nfs4,smbfs,ncpfs,cifs,gfs 
-O no_netdev 
to: action $"Mounting local filesystems: \n" mount -a -t nonfs,nfs4,smbfs,ncpfs,cifs,gfs -O 
no_netdev 
(added \n) 
 
all this is just for a little more readable output 
 
kindly, 
nadav :-) 

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
8.11.1-1

How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1.booting  
2.  
3.  
    

Additional info:
Comment 1 Rahul Sundaram 2005-08-13 19:45:46 EDT
can you supply this as a patch.Next time you file in a bug, put in a better
subject like "Patch to enhance readability" or something like that.
Comment 2 Nadav Kavalerchik 2005-08-14 04:04:51 EDT
i'd love to, but i don't know how to make a patch :-( 
Comment 3 Bill Nottingham 2005-10-03 17:24:23 EDT
I'm not sure what the purpose is here - why do you want an extra newline in the
output?
Comment 4 Nadav Kavalerchik 2005-10-05 03:06:34 EDT
because... 
when something goes wrong with the mount command, the output gets cluttered and 
just for the sake of visual clarity i added a newline. 
(it a very lowww priority issue) 
Comment 5 Bill Nottingham 2005-10-05 15:41:13 EDT
I'd rather not change these strings and require retranslation for that.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.