Bug 162397 - gpg program fails with error loading shared libraries
Summary: gpg program fails with error loading shared libraries
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 161859
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: gnupg
Version: 3
Hardware: i686
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Nalin Dahyabhai
QA Contact: Mike McLean
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2005-07-04 03:56 UTC by Kevin Hart
Modified: 2007-11-30 22:11 UTC (History)
0 users

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2005-07-06 17:53:17 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Kevin Hart 2005-07-04 03:56:38 UTC
From Bugzilla Helper:
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.8) Gecko/20050513 Fedora/1.0.4-1.3.1 Firefox/1.0.4

Description of problem:
While trying to run the gpg program (even without any flags) from the gnupg package, the program fails, giving an error message: "gpg: error while loading shared libraries: cannot restore segment prot after reloc: permission denied".

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
gnupg-1.2.6-1

How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Install package gnupg-1.2.6-1.
2. Run "gpg".
  

Actual Results:  Received the aforementioned error: "gpg: error while loading shared libraries: cannot restore segment prot after reloc: permission denied".

Expected Results:  The program "gpg" should have run without error.

Additional info:

I tried re-installing the package with no luck. I googled for the exact error message and found sone things, but nothing matching my problem.

Comment 1 Nalin Dahyabhai 2005-07-05 14:39:32 UTC
Are you using SELinux?  If so, which version of selinux-policy-targeted is
installed?  I ask because this may be a duplicate of bug #161859.

Comment 2 Kevin Hart 2005-07-06 17:48:11 UTC
I'm using selinux-policy-targeted-1.17.30-3.15 ... so it may be a duplicate of
the bug. I'm sorry, but when I searched for my problem I found no fixes. I'll
try the solutions there and post back soon.

Comment 3 Kevin Hart 2005-07-06 17:51:07 UTC
Yes, 16 worked for me. I'm sorry I didn't see this before, but I do believe it's
a duplicate. Again, I'm sorry, but thank you for pointing that bug out to me, Nalin.

Comment 4 Kevin Hart 2005-07-06 17:53:17 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 161859 ***


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.