Bug 162574 - RFE: acroread 5 does not understand PDF version 1.5
RFE: acroread 5 does not understand PDF version 1.5
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 3
Classification: Red Hat
Component: acroread (Show other bugs)
i386 Linux
medium Severity medium
: ---
: ---
Assigned To: Dan Williams
: FutureFeature
Depends On:
  Show dependency treegraph
Reported: 2005-07-06 09:48 EDT by Andrew Gormanly
Modified: 2007-11-30 17:07 EST (History)
0 users

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Enhancement
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Last Closed: 2005-07-12 12:08:47 EDT
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---

Attachments (Terms of Use)

  None (edit)
Description Andrew Gormanly 2005-07-06 09:48:49 EDT
From Bugzilla Helper:
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.8) Gecko/20050512 Red Hat/1.7.8-

Description of problem:
When opening some PDF files with acroread 5.10, newer ones cause the error message:

"This file may contain newer information than this viewer can support.  It may not open or display correctly.  Adobe recommends that you upgrade to the latest version of our Acrobat products.  Please visit our product site at http://www.adobe.com/acrobat"

to be displayed.  It seems that this version of acroread does not properly understand PDF version 1.5, only 1.4 and lower.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

How reproducible:

Steps to Reproduce:
1. View a PDF 1.5 document

Actual Results:  Error message, sometimes bits of document not displayed.

Expected Results:  RHEL should include a PDF viewer capable of rendering these documents.

Additional info:

The version of xpdf in RHEL3 has the same limitation; Adobe Reader 7.0 does not have this issue, neither does xpdf 3.0

The example URI above is the one that gave me the error message today, but there have been many others recently, and some were missing chunks (mostly images).
Comment 1 Andrew Gormanly 2005-07-12 12:08:47 EDT
This is now fixed by the (unrelated) errata release of acroread-7.0.0-4.1.0.EL3
and acroread-7.0.0-4.2.0.EL4

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.