Bug 1632305 - python-stem: Remove (sub)packages from Fedora 30+: python2-stem
Summary: python-stem: Remove (sub)packages from Fedora 30+: python2-stem
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: python-stem
Version: rawhide
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Juan Orti
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: PY2REMOVAL
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2018-09-24 15:31 UTC by Miro Hrončok
Modified: 2018-10-11 14:53 UTC (History)
7 users (show)

Fixed In Version: python-stem-1.7.0-1.fc30
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2018-10-11 14:53:08 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Miro Hrončok 2018-09-24 15:31:05 UTC
In line with the Mass Python 2 Package Removal [0], the following (sub)packages of python-stem were marked for removal:

 * python2-stem

According to our query, those (sub)packages only provide a Python 2 importable module. If this is not true, please tell us why, so we can fix our query.

Please remove them from your package.

As said in the change document, if there is no objection in a week, we will remove the package(s) as soon as we get to it. This change might not match your packaging style, so we'd prefer if you did the change. If you need more time, please let us know here.

We hope this doesn't come to you as a surprise. If you want to know our motivation for this, please read the change document [0].

[0] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Mass_Python_2_Package_Removal

Comment 1 Juan Orti 2018-10-10 08:36:01 UTC
Hi,

Should I provide: python-stem in the python3 subpackage with the macro or without it?

%{?python_provide:%python_provide python3-stem}

Comment 2 Miro Hrončok 2018-10-10 10:02:58 UTC
You should use that macro. It will make sure it is (not) provided based on a global switch.

Comment 3 Miro Hrončok 2018-10-11 14:25:15 UTC
There has been no build.

Comment 4 Juan Orti 2018-10-11 14:38:26 UTC
Yes, it has been built:

https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1151958

Is there something else missing?

Comment 5 Miro Hrončok 2018-10-11 14:53:08 UTC
I'm sorry. I must have posted this to a wrong bug :(


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.