Bug 163520 - No support for OOo 2 document extensions and some others
No support for OOo 2 document extensions and some others
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: bash-completion (Show other bugs)
noarch Linux
medium Severity medium
: ---
: ---
Assigned To: Ville Skyttä
Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
Depends On:
  Show dependency treegraph
Reported: 2005-07-18 11:22 EDT by Horst H. von Brand
Modified: 2007-11-30 17:11 EST (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version: 20050712-1
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Last Closed: 2005-07-31 11:37:10 EDT
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---

Attachments (Terms of Use)
Patch to /etc/bash_completion which should fix some of the brokenness (1.53 KB, patch)
2005-07-18 11:22 EDT, Horst H. von Brand
no flags Details | Diff

  None (edit)
Description Horst H. von Brand 2005-07-18 11:22:58 EDT
Description of problem:
OpenOffice 2 documents aren't recognized

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

How reproducible:

Steps to Reproduce:
1. oowriter \t
Actual results:
Doesn't find something.odt

Expected results:
Complete with available files

Additional info:
Comment 1 Horst H. von Brand 2005-07-18 11:22:58 EDT
Created attachment 116873 [details]
Patch to /etc/bash_completion which should fix some of the brokenness
Comment 2 Ville Skyttä 2005-07-18 12:11:32 EDT
Thanks; some bits of your update are already included in the 2005-07-15 
version of bash-completion which I've prepared and will build/ship as soon as 
the Extras build system is ready again. 
I'll include the changes from your patch that weren't yet there, but a couple 
of questions: 
What's "sxa"?  Your patch makes oodraw complete on it, but I couldn't find 
info about sxa in oodraw or by Googling. 
About "vor"; if I understand correctly, it's not at all exclusively for old 
oodraw templates, but for any old StarOffice/OpenOffice.org document 
templates.  Do you think it should be added to all oo* tools? 
Comment 3 Ville Skyttä 2005-07-18 12:19:46 EDT
(Oops, a minor correction: the new version pending for build is 20050712.) 
Comment 4 Horst H. von Brand 2005-07-18 13:32:49 EDT
Oops, sxa seems to be a typo for sxd (yes, my handwriting sucks, and getting the
text out of OOo's menu for "Open file" isn't easy...). Sorry.

Besides, I'm more of an ocassional user of OOo, and a rather new one to booth.
I'm not qualified to decide on .vor
Comment 5 Horst H. von Brand 2005-07-18 13:34:52 EDT
Oh, BTW: All the .o{d,t}? formats are zip(1)ed XML, are they not? If so, they
should also go under zip.

And many thanks for your work! It is much appreciated.
Comment 6 Ville Skyttä 2005-07-18 15:59:09 EDT
Ok, thanks for the update.  Here's what I've done so far regarding this: 
Added stuff from your patch that wasn't in 20050712, except for "vor".  I also 
added "mml" (MathML) for oomath. 
Regarding the zip'd XML: yes, I believe you're right.  But they should 
obviously go under unzip, not zip... anyway, before applying that, I would 
suggest asking for upstream's opinion on this.  His email address can be found 
at the bottom of /usr/share/doc/bash-completion-*/README 
Comment 7 Ville Skyttä 2005-07-31 11:37:10 EDT
Fixed in >= 20050712-1, and all patches applied upstream as of >= 20050720-1.  

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.