Note: This bug is displayed in read-only format because the product is no longer active in Red Hat Bugzilla.

Bug 1635756

Summary: YUM report a collectd failure during 4.0 to 4.2 upgrade.
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Virtualization Manager Reporter: Frank DeLorey <fdelorey>
Component: ovirt-fast-forward-upgradeAssignee: Douglas Schilling Landgraf <dougsland>
Status: CLOSED NOTABUG QA Contact: meital avital <mavital>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 4.2.6CC: dougsland, fdelorey, michal.skrivanek, ratamir, rmcswain, sbonazzo
Target Milestone: ---Flags: lsvaty: testing_plan_complete-
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2018-10-04 07:39:35 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: Integration RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Frank DeLorey 2018-10-03 15:36:49 UTC
Description of problem:

Customer doing a fast forward upgrade is seeing the following failure during engine setup:


# engine-setup
[ INFO  ] Stage: Initializing
[ INFO  ] Stage: Environment setup
          Configuration files: ['/etc/ovirt-engine-setup.conf.d/10-packaging-wsp.conf', '/etc/ovirt-engine-setup.conf.d/10-packaging.conf', '/etc/ovirt-engine-setup.conf.d/20-setup-ovirt-post.conf']
          Log file: /var/log/ovirt-engine/setup/ovirt-engine-setup-20181002133253-5yl2x5.log
          Version: otopi-1.6.3 (otopi-1.6.3-1.el7ev)
[ INFO  ] Stage: Environment packages setup
[ INFO  ] Stage: Programs detection
[ INFO  ] Stage: Environment setup
[ INFO  ] Stage: Environment customization

          Welcome to the RHEV 4.1 setup/upgrade.
          Please read the RHEV 4.1 install guide
          https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/red_hat_virtualization/4.1/html/installation_guide/index.html
          Please refer to the RHEV Upgrade Helper application
          https://access.redhat.com/labs/rhevupgradehelper/ which will guide you in the upgrading process.
          Would you like to proceed? (Yes, No) [Yes]:

          --== PRODUCT OPTIONS ==--


          --== PACKAGES ==--

[ INFO  ] Checking for product updates...
[ ERROR ] Yum [u'collectd-write_http-5.8.0-3.el7.x86_64 requires collectd(x86-64) = 5.8.0-3.el7', u'collectd-disk-5.8.0-3.el7.x86_64 requires collectd(x86-64) = 5.8.0-3.el7']
[ INFO  ] Yum Performing yum transaction rollback
[ ERROR ] Failed to execute stage 'Environment customization': [u'collectd-write_http-5.8.0-3.el7.x86_64 requires collectd(x86-64) = 5.8.0-3.el7', u'collectd-disk-5.8.0-3.el7.x86_64 requires collectd(x86-64) = 5.8.0-3.el7']
[ INFO  ] Stage: Clean up
          Log file is located at /var/log/ovirt-engine/setup/ovirt-engine-setup-20181002133253-5yl2x5.log
[ INFO  ] Generating answer file '/var/lib/ovirt-engine/setup/answers/20181002133316-setup.conf'
[ INFO  ] Stage: Pre-termination
[ INFO  ] Stage: Termination
[ ERROR ] Execution of setup failed



How reproducible:

Every time.

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Added the correct repositories
2. Ran fast upgrade from 4.0 to 4.1

Actual results:

Fails complaining about collectd packages

Expected results:

Should upgrade as expected

Additional info:

This was reported previously here: https://access.redhat.com/discussions/3035971

For a workaround they removed all the collectd packages.

Comment 3 Sandro Bonazzola 2018-10-04 07:39:35 UTC
Closing as not a bug due to EPEL repository being enabled. Removing EPEL solved.

Comment 4 Frank DeLorey 2018-10-15 12:57:14 UTC
I guess our upgrade tools can't detect this and report a warning?

Comment 5 Sandro Bonazzola 2018-10-16 02:20:59 UTC
(In reply to Frank DeLorey from comment #4)
> I guess our upgrade tools can't detect this and report a warning?

We can probably add a check on enabled repos not in the required list and issue a warning, but we already have the list of repositories in documentation. Douglas, can you consider adding such check in next release we'll have for 4.3?

Comment 6 Douglas Schilling Landgraf 2018-10-16 17:26:53 UTC
(In reply to Sandro Bonazzola from comment #5)
> (In reply to Frank DeLorey from comment #4)
> > I guess our upgrade tools can't detect this and report a warning?
> 
> We can probably add a check on enabled repos not in the required list and
> issue a warning, but we already have the list of repositories in
> documentation. Douglas, can you consider adding such check in next release
> we'll have for 4.3?

Hi Sandro/Frank,

Do you think worth check only for EPEL repos?

Today when the tool starts and find a non standard repository like EPEL or internal repos we log and show a warning message like:

"The following repositories are enabled and not the main repositories for RHV"

Maybe we can add an input like:

'are you sure you want to continue? It might generate conflicts on rpm dep. [N/y]'

Comment 7 Frank DeLorey 2018-10-16 17:29:30 UTC
That would be very helpful thanks!!

Frank

Comment 8 Robert McSwain 2018-10-16 20:55:48 UTC
Douglas,

I would also agree that this would be very helpful for customers. I've seen a number of cases where customers have additional non-required repos for RHV as well as EPEL that have caused big issues to the point that this is one of the earliest things I try to check when I see dependency issues. Having this built in would deflect a number of install issues.

Comment 9 Douglas Schilling Landgraf 2018-10-17 18:10:29 UTC
(In reply to Robert McSwain from comment #8)
> Douglas,
> 
> I would also agree that this would be very helpful for customers. I've seen
> a number of cases where customers have additional non-required repos for RHV
> as well as EPEL that have caused big issues to the point that this is one of
> the earliest things I try to check when I see dependency issues. Having this
> built in would deflect a number of install issues.

Fell free to give a feedback guys: https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/95001/

Comment 10 Sandro Bonazzola 2018-10-29 13:13:14 UTC
(In reply to Douglas Schilling Landgraf from comment #6)
> (In reply to Sandro Bonazzola from comment #5)
> "The following repositories are enabled and not the main repositories for
> RHV"
> 
> Maybe we can add an input like:
> 
> 'are you sure you want to continue? It might generate conflicts on rpm dep.
> [N/y]'

looks ok to me