RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.

Description of problem:
I'm trying to understand a failed execchield check in rpmdiff:

  https://rpmdiff.engineering.redhat.com/run/388139/7/

---snip---
Detecting usr/lib64/libusbguard.so.0.0.0 with not-hardened warnings '
Hardened: libusbguard.so.0.0.0: FAIL: Gaps were detected in the annobin coverage.  Run with -v to list.
' on x86_64
---snip---

I've tried to run the annocheck locally using two versions: annobin-8.23-1.fc29 and latest upstream version. Both give a different output but both report gaps.

Is this a real problem in usbguard or rather a false positive as reported elsewhere (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1657912, etc...).

(In reply to Daniel Kopeček from comment #0)

Hi Daniel,

> I've tried to run the annocheck locally using two versions:
> annobin-8.23-1.fc29 and latest upstream version. 

When you say "latest version", which version was that ?

> Is this a real problem in usbguard or rather a false positive as reported
> elsewhere.

I think that it is a false positive again.  I tried rebuilding usbguard locally
with annobin 8.66 installed and no gaps were generated.

Cheers
  Nick

(In reply to Nick Clifton from comment #2)
> (In reply to Daniel Kopeček from comment #0)
> 
> Hi Daniel,
> 
> > I've tried to run the annocheck locally using two versions:
> > annobin-8.23-1.fc29 and latest upstream version. 
> 
> When you say "latest version", which version was that ?

A git checkout that I made today 67a30506b1b069f147b08ef9773b867ec494194d.

> > Is this a real problem in usbguard or rather a false positive as reported
> > elsewhere.
> 
> I think that it is a false positive again.  I tried rebuilding usbguard
> locally
> with annobin 8.66 installed and no gaps were generated.

Ok, thanks for confirmation!