Note: This bug is displayed in read-only format because the product is no longer active in Red Hat Bugzilla.

RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.

Person A: Today the rpmdb in the container is large:

```-rw-r--r--  0 0      0      528384 Jan 25 15:34 var/lib/rpm/Basenames
-rw-r--r--  0 0      0     1318912 Jan 25 15:34 var/lib/rpm/__db.003
-rw-r--r--  0 0      0     6623232 Jan 25 15:34 var/lib/rpm/Packages```

Person B: yeah.. i bet the changelogs are a large part of that too

I think the RFE here is for a much smaller rpmdb particularly for our microdnf-based container.

Let us start by asking for advice, cloning this for rpm.

Simple run of "rpm --rebuilddb" post-build would save considerable space and it would also clean up RPM's secondary indices (__db*).

Fo the current minimal image it saves ~600K:
(https://brewweb.engineering.redhat.com/brew/buildinfo?buildID=969078)

[root@localhost 015629c07862e8cf022472e28989e7a45113339c9e80463bc9c9bb0938cd30b5]# chroot .

[root@localhost /]# du -h /var/lib/rpm
5.9M	/var/lib/rpm

[root@localhost /]# rpm --rebuilddb

[root@localhost /]# du -h /var/lib/rpm
5.3M	/var/lib/rpm

After evaluating this issue, there are no plans to address it further or fix it in an upcoming release.  Therefore, it is being closed.  If plans change such that this issue will be fixed in an upcoming release, then the bug can be reopened.