kronosnet failed to build from source in Fedora rawhide/f30
For details on the mass rebuild see:
Please fix kronosnet at your earliest convenience and set the bug's status to
ASSIGNED when you start fixing it. If the bug remains in NEW state for 8 weeks,
kronosnet will be orphaned. Before branching of Fedora 31,
kronosnet will be retired, if it still fails to build.
For more details on the FTBFS policy, please visit:
Created attachment 1530822 [details]
file build.log too big, will only attach last 1024 bytes
Created attachment 1530823 [details]
file root.log too big, will only attach last 1024 bytes
Created attachment 1530824 [details]
FYI, this will get fixed once rebased to 1.7:
(a bug to update the packaged version would be auto-created if enabled
somewhere in package settings and/or tracked w/ release-monitoring.org)
since it contains:
If there's an urgency to make the package buildable again, this PR
(chronologically preceding the v1.7 release) can be pulled in:
Fixed with 1.7 and now 1.8.
Package quality is not good.
re [comment 5]:
Thanks for the effort.
> Package quality is not good.
Yep, it wasn't when I volunteered to review the package, sadly, there
were some political forces behind that, it seemed, so not sure that
everything was in order.
Seeing your recent PRs like:
makes me wonder, did ldconfig invocations, something I expressly
pointed out in the review [bug 1507103 comment 79] actually recidivate?
Interesting. Or maybe not.
(In reply to Jan Pokorný [poki] from comment #6)
> re [comment 5]:
> Thanks for the effort.
> > Package quality is not good.
> Yep, it wasn't when I volunteered to review the package, sadly, there
> were some political forces behind that, it seemed, so not sure that
> everything was in order.
> Seeing your recent PRs like:
> makes me wonder, did ldconfig invocations, something I expressly
> pointed out in the review [bug 1507103 comment 79] actually recidivate?
> Interesting. Or maybe not.
The ldconfig stuff has been in this spec since I came across it while testing f29 -> f30 upgrade and f29 was 1.7 and rawhide was 1.5. I did PRs at that time, but these were missed apparently. I am now doing baby step bug reports and PRs. Hopefully we can get these in and the packaging of kronosnet up to par, and educate the maintainer in the process.