kronosnet failed to build from source in Fedora rawhide/f30 https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=32405724 For details on the mass rebuild see: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_30_Mass_Rebuild Please fix kronosnet at your earliest convenience and set the bug's status to ASSIGNED when you start fixing it. If the bug remains in NEW state for 8 weeks, kronosnet will be orphaned. Before branching of Fedora 31, kronosnet will be retired, if it still fails to build. For more details on the FTBFS policy, please visit: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fails_to_build_from_source
Created attachment 1530822 [details] build.log file build.log too big, will only attach last 1024 bytes
Created attachment 1530823 [details] root.log file root.log too big, will only attach last 1024 bytes
Created attachment 1530824 [details] state.log
FYI, this will get fixed once rebased to 1.7: https://github.com/kronosnet/kronosnet/releases/tag/v1.7 (a bug to update the packaged version would be auto-created if enabled somewhere in package settings and/or tracked w/ release-monitoring.org) since it contains: https://github.com/kronosnet/kronosnet/commit/97924ac12d8da26b61d3bc3ab90fbd86b0b58e72 If there's an urgency to make the package buildable again, this PR (chronologically preceding the v1.7 release) can be pulled in: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/kronosnet/pull-request/1
Fixed with 1.7 and now 1.8. Package quality is not good.
re [comment 5]: Thanks for the effort. > Package quality is not good. Yep, it wasn't when I volunteered to review the package, sadly, there were some political forces behind that, it seemed, so not sure that everything was in order. Seeing your recent PRs like: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/kronosnet/pull-request/9 makes me wonder, did ldconfig invocations, something I expressly pointed out in the review [bug 1507103 comment 79] actually recidivate? Interesting. Or maybe not.
(In reply to Jan Pokorný [poki] from comment #6) > re [comment 5]: > > Thanks for the effort. > > > Package quality is not good. > > Yep, it wasn't when I volunteered to review the package, sadly, there > were some political forces behind that, it seemed, so not sure that > everything was in order. > > Seeing your recent PRs like: > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/kronosnet/pull-request/9 > makes me wonder, did ldconfig invocations, something I expressly > pointed out in the review [bug 1507103 comment 79] actually recidivate? > Interesting. Or maybe not. The ldconfig stuff has been in this spec since I came across it while testing f29 -> f30 upgrade and f29 was 1.7 and rawhide was 1.5. I did PRs at that time, but these were missed apparently. I am now doing baby step bug reports and PRs. Hopefully we can get these in and the packaging of kronosnet up to par, and educate the maintainer in the process.