Bug 169111 - LTC10091-64 bit stack not sufficiently aligned for setjmp
Summary: LTC10091-64 bit stack not sufficiently aligned for setjmp
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 3
Classification: Red Hat
Component: gcc
Version: 3.0
Hardware: powerpc
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Jakub Jelinek
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On: 128360
Blocks: 161600 168424
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2005-09-23 04:37 UTC by Alexandre Oliva
Modified: 2007-11-30 22:07 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version: RHBA-2006-0147
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2006-03-15 15:29:05 UTC
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHBA-2006:0147 0 qe-ready SHIPPED_LIVE gcc bug fix update 2006-03-14 05:00:00 UTC

Comment 1 Alexandre Oliva 2005-09-23 06:55:09 UTC
Created attachment 119177 [details]
Conservative fix for the problem

I started out by fixing STACK_BOUNDARY, such that the compiler would emit code
to preserve the correct stack alignment, but also assume such alignment.  I
decided this wasn't such a good idea, for binary compatibility, and instead
modified the compiler such that it would preserve the additional alignment, but
not rely on it.  

This will hopefully be enough to fix the problem, but I haven't been able to
actually verify that the problem is fixed, other than by inspecting the
generated assembly code and verifying that the generated code for the testcase
is the same in both my original fix and the one I present here.

Comment 10 Red Hat Bugzilla 2006-03-15 15:29:05 UTC
An advisory has been issued which should help the problem
described in this bug report. This report is therefore being
closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information
on the solution and/or where to find the updated files,
please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report
if the solution does not work for you.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2006-0147.html



Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.