Initially reported here: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/42SFAAFB7I4HFKKC5G4BG53JUY4FS4QJ/ > One more thing about those two specific packages, they also don't > provide binaries suffixed with "-3" so that means having to change > packaging again so that configures picks up rst2man-3.6 instead of > rst2man-3.4 and that's not a comfortable place to be in downstream. And Orion Poplawski's suggestion: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/WVX2I3JW56VPUXZZU36QC7XXSCAAT5GM/ > The python3{4,6}-sphinx packages do provide /usr/bin/sphinx-build-3, > etc. In fact one reason why you currently cannot install both. > > As for docutils, file a bug against python3-docutils in EPEL and we'll > get that fixed up. This way I don't have to change my RPM specs when epel7 goes from python3x-docutils to a greater python3X-docutils, as this would provide some stability to be able to just run rst2man-3 and others and not have to care when a specific version of Python 3.x goes EOL.
python3-docutils-0.14-1.el7 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 7. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2019-5f2841e1a2
python3-docutils-0.14-1.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2019-5f2841e1a2
python3-docutils-0.14-1.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.