This bug has been migrated to another issue tracking site. It has been closed here and may no longer be being monitored.

If you would like to get updates for this issue, or to participate in it, you may do so at Red Hat Issue Tracker .
RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.
Bug 1721973 - fsck.gfs2 is too slow
Summary: fsck.gfs2 is too slow
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED MIGRATED
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8
Classification: Red Hat
Component: gfs2-utils
Version: 8.0
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
high
unspecified
Target Milestone: rc
: 8.2
Assignee: Andrew Price
QA Contact: cluster-qe
URL:
Whiteboard:
: 1451443 (view as bug list)
Depends On:
Blocks: 1451449 1717513 1738682
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2019-06-19 10:33 UTC by Andrew Price
Modified: 2023-09-22 21:11 UTC (History)
7 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of: 1451449
: 1738682 (view as bug list)
Environment:
Last Closed: 2023-09-22 21:11:11 UTC
Type: Bug
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
pm-rhel: mirror+


Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Issue Tracker   RHEL-7767 0 None Migrated None 2023-09-22 21:10:53 UTC
Red Hat Knowledge Base (Solution) 29416 0 None None None 2020-11-12 15:26:09 UTC

Description Andrew Price 2019-06-19 10:33:22 UTC
+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #1451449 +++

Description of problem:

Checking a 300TB file system which is 80% full can take a full week with an average throughput of 5-10MB/s.

Comment 5 Steve Whitehouse 2020-05-11 10:19:57 UTC
This is going to be at least 8.4 at this stage.

Comment 9 Andrew Price 2020-11-12 15:26:10 UTC
*** Bug 1451443 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 11 RHEL Program Management 2021-02-01 07:41:35 UTC
After evaluating this issue, there are no plans to address it further or fix it in an upcoming release.  Therefore, it is being closed.  If plans change such that this issue will be fixed in an upcoming release, then the bug can be reopened.

Comment 12 Andrew Price 2021-02-01 09:30:53 UTC
This still needs to be addressed but the new process is to have longer-term work tracked upstream so we'll take it there and bring it back to Bugzilla and/or Jira once an upstream solution is baked.

Comment 17 RHEL Program Management 2021-08-01 07:27:06 UTC
After evaluating this issue, there are no plans to address it further or fix it in an upcoming release.  Therefore, it is being closed.  If plans change such that this issue will be fixed in an upcoming release, then the bug can be reopened.

Comment 18 Steve Whitehouse 2021-08-01 08:51:01 UTC
Reopening as this is being actively worked on

Comment 21 RHEL Program Management 2022-02-01 07:27:24 UTC
After evaluating this issue, there are no plans to address it further or fix it in an upcoming release.  Therefore, it is being closed.  If plans change such that this issue will be fixed in an upcoming release, then the bug can be reopened.

Comment 24 RHEL Program Management 2022-08-01 07:27:51 UTC
After evaluating this issue, there are no plans to address it further or fix it in an upcoming release.  Therefore, it is being closed.  If plans change such that this issue will be fixed in an upcoming release, then the bug can be reopened.

Comment 28 RHEL Program Management 2023-09-22 21:09:28 UTC
Issue migration from Bugzilla to Jira is in process at this time. This will be the last message in Jira copied from the Bugzilla bug.

Comment 29 RHEL Program Management 2023-09-22 21:11:11 UTC
This BZ has been automatically migrated to the issues.redhat.com Red Hat Issue Tracker. All future work related to this report will be managed there.

Due to differences in account names between systems, some fields were not replicated.  Be sure to add yourself to Jira issue's "Watchers" field to continue receiving updates and add others to the "Need Info From" field to continue requesting information.

To find the migrated issue, look in the "Links" section for a direct link to the new issue location. The issue key will have an icon of 2 footprints next to it, and begin with "RHEL-" followed by an integer.  You can also find this issue by visiting https://issues.redhat.com/issues/?jql= and searching the "Bugzilla Bug" field for this BZ's number, e.g. a search like:

"Bugzilla Bug" = 1234567

In the event you have trouble locating or viewing this issue, you can file an issue by sending mail to rh-issues. You can also visit https://access.redhat.com/articles/7032570 for general account information.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.