Bug 174031 - selinux-policy-targeted - "missing whitespace" error
Summary: selinux-policy-targeted - "missing whitespace" error
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: selinux-policy-targeted
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Daniel Walsh
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2005-11-23 22:49 UTC by Michal Jaegermann
Modified: 2007-11-30 22:11 UTC (History)
0 users

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2005-12-13 04:21:31 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Michal Jaegermann 2005-11-23 22:49:02 UTC
Description of problem:

During installation the following shows up:

  Installing: selinux-policy-targeted      ##################### [104/224]
libsemanage.parse_assert_space: missing whitespace
(/etc/selinux/targeted/modules/tmp/seusers: 1):
root:root:s0-s0:c0.c255
libsemanage.seuser_parse: could not parse seuser record
libsemanage.dbase_file_cache: could not cache file database
libsemanage.enter_ro: could not enter read-only section
libsemanage.semanage_base_merge_components: could not merge local modifications
into policy
Failed!

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
selinux-policy-targeted-2.0.4-1

Comment 1 Michal Jaegermann 2005-11-26 22:52:53 UTC
I am seeing the same error now with selinux-policy-targeted-2.0.5-4 too.
In fact it prevents proper updates.  It was necessary to use 'rpm --force ...'
or, according to rpm, I am stuck forever with selinux-policy-targeted-2.0.4-1.

Comment 2 Stephen Warren 2005-12-06 04:45:45 UTC
I see the same error messages here, *but* "rpm -q selinux-policy-targeted" shows
that the install did actually occur - no need to force it.

I installed fc5test1

I have been booting with selinux=0

On 2005/12/05 21:40 MST, I was actually able to get a "yum update" to go through
for the first time, which picked up selinux-policy-targeted-2.0.8-1

I haven't made any local modifications to the selinux config file (not knowingly
at least!)


Comment 3 Daniel Walsh 2005-12-06 15:54:02 UTC
Did you see the same problem with 2.0.8-1?

Dan

Comment 4 Michal Jaegermann 2005-12-06 18:07:34 UTC
> Did you see the same problem with 2.0.8-1?

No, I do not; but because of the other trouble described in bug #174953
I am not sure if this is masked, I am not getting that far, the other one
is really a different manifestation of the same, or this is truly gone.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.