Bug 175834 - i386 stack trace is missing when x86_64 has one
Summary: i386 stack trace is missing when x86_64 has one
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: gcc
Version: rawhide
Hardware: i386
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Tom Tromey
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2005-12-15 16:47 UTC by Andrew Overholt
Modified: 2014-08-11 05:46 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

(edit)
Clone Of:
(edit)
Last Closed: 2006-01-17 16:50:51 UTC

Attachments (Terms of Use)
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Description Andrew Overholt 2005-12-15 16:47:34 UTC 
Description of problem:
As per bug 175833, there is a stack trace in the x86_64 build log but not on i386.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
4.1.0-0.8

Actual results:
     [java] Exception in thread "main" java.lang.IllegalAccessError:
org.xml.sax.helpers.NamespaceSupport$Context:
org.xml.sax.helpers.NamespaceSupport.EMPTY_ENUMERATION
     [java]    <<No stacktrace available>>


Expected results:
     [java] Exception in thread "main" java.lang.IllegalAccessError:
org.xml.sax.helpers.NamespaceSupport$Context:
org.xml.sax.helpers.NamespaceSupport.EMPTY_ENUMERATION
     [java]    at
org.xml.sax.helpers.NamespaceSupport$Context.getDeclaredPrefixes (libgcj.so.7)
     [java]    at org.xml.sax.helpers.NamespaceSupport.getDeclaredPrefixes
(libgcj.so.7)
     [java]    at gnu.xml.aelfred2.SAXDriver.endElement (libgcj.so.7)
[...]

Additional info:
Comment 1 Andrew Overholt 2006-01-17 16:41:49 UTC 
I think this is now fixed.  Right, Tom?
Comment 2 Andrew Overholt 2006-01-17 16:50:51 UTC 
Tom told me on IRC that this has been fixed and I can't duplicate it anymore.

Closing.
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.