Bug 1759206 - Review Request: xpanes - Awesome tmux-based terminal divider
Summary: Review Request: xpanes - Awesome tmux-based terminal divider
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Robert-André Mauchin 🐧
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2019-10-07 15:36 UTC by Carl George
Modified: 2019-10-26 17:23 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2019-10-17 23:23:22 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:
zebob.m: fedora-review+


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Carl George 2019-10-07 15:36:37 UTC
Spec URL: https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/carlwgeorge/reviews/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/01045413-xpanes/xpanes.spec
SRPM URL: https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/carlwgeorge/reviews/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/01045413-xpanes/xpanes-4.1.1-1.fc32.src.rpm

Description:
Xpanes is the ultimate terminal divider powered by tmux.  It has the following
features:

- Split tmux window into multiple panes
- Construct command lines & execute them on the panes
- Runnable from outside of tmux session
- Runnable from inside of tmux session
- Record operation log
- Flexible layout arrangement for panes
- Select layout presets
- Set columns or rows as you like
- Display pane title on each pane
- Generate command lines from standard input (Pipe mode)

Fedora Account System Username: carlwgeorge

Comment 1 Robert-André Mauchin 🐧 2019-10-07 19:51:57 UTC
LGTM, package approved.



Package Review
==============

Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed



===== MUST items =====

Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
     other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
     Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
     Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
     found: "Unknown or generated", "Expat License". 20 files have unknown
     license. Detailed output of licensecheck in
     /home/bob/packaging/review/xpanes/review-xpanes/licensecheck.txt
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
     Note: Dirs in package are owned also by: /usr/share/zsh/site-
     functions(creds, vcsh, pdfgrep, swayidle, libinput, reprepro, xss-
     lock, restic, buku, sway, skim, podman, mako, python3-wstool,
     exercism, flatpak, swaylock, curl, exa, osmium-tool, lastpass-cli,
     gpaste, pulseaudio, why3, fzf, nnn, task, firewalld, ripgrep, fd-find,
     kompose, imgp, awscli, stratis-cli, docker-compose, ninja-build, arch-
     install-scripts, googler, ddgr, zola, khard, mercurial, zsh)
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
     names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
     Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
     (~1MB) or number of files.
     Note: Documentation size is 61440 bytes in 1 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
     one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
     Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
     license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
     license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
     beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
     work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
     provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
     %{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local

===== SHOULD items =====

Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
     file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[?]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[-]: Sources are verified with gpgverify first in %prep if upstream
     publishes signatures.
     Note: gpgverify is not used.
[-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
     translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
     architectures.
[-]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed
     files.
[x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[x]: Buildroot is not present
[x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
     $RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
[x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin.
[x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file
[x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag
[x]: SourceX is a working URL.
[x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified.

===== EXTRA items =====

Generic:
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages.
     Note: No rpmlint messages.
[x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM.


Rpmlint
-------
Checking: xpanes-4.1.1-1.fc32.noarch.rpm
          xpanes-4.1.1-1.fc32.src.rpm
xpanes.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) tmux -> tux
xpanes.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US tmux -> tux
xpanes.src: W: no-%build-section
2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings.

Comment 2 Gwyn Ciesla 2019-10-07 20:23:01 UTC
(fedscm-admin):  The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/xpanes

Comment 3 Fedora Update System 2019-10-08 03:39:07 UTC
FEDORA-2019-bee4c57357 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 31. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-bee4c57357

Comment 4 Fedora Update System 2019-10-08 03:39:10 UTC
FEDORA-EPEL-2019-86652a3ecc has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 8. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2019-86652a3ecc

Comment 5 Fedora Update System 2019-10-08 03:39:13 UTC
FEDORA-2019-c577a0f3cd has been submitted as an update to Fedora 30. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-c577a0f3cd

Comment 6 Carl George 2019-10-08 14:16:05 UTC
rawhide: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-e68e47bf91

Comment 7 Fedora Update System 2019-10-09 03:24:58 UTC
xpanes-4.1.1-1.fc31 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-bee4c57357

Comment 8 Fedora Update System 2019-10-09 17:39:38 UTC
xpanes-4.1.1-1.fc30 has been pushed to the Fedora 30 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-c577a0f3cd

Comment 9 Fedora Update System 2019-10-09 18:57:44 UTC
xpanes-4.1.1-1.el8 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 8 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2019-86652a3ecc

Comment 10 Fedora Update System 2019-10-17 23:23:22 UTC
xpanes-4.1.1-1.fc30 has been pushed to the Fedora 30 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

Comment 11 Fedora Update System 2019-10-18 16:53:06 UTC
xpanes-4.1.1-1.fc30 has been pushed to the Fedora 30 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

Comment 12 Fedora Update System 2019-10-25 17:28:27 UTC
xpanes-4.1.1-1.el8 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 8 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

Comment 13 Fedora Update System 2019-10-26 17:23:28 UTC
xpanes-4.1.1-1.fc31 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.