This bug has been copied from bug #1712768 and has been proposed to be backported to 7.7 z-stream (EUS).
Hello Red Hat / Karel, ... would it be possible that you provide us the updated rpm "util-linux-2.23.2-61.el7_7.1" for our early testing ...? If this would be possible, please provide the rpm _for 390x_ ... ... please advise. Thanks in advance for your support.
(In reply to Hanns-Joachim Uhl from comment #4) > If this would be possible, please provide the rpm _for 390x_ ... Sure, unofficial and for testing only (src and 390 rpms): http://people.redhat.com/kzak/bz1766091/ Look forward for your feedback, thanks.
(In reply to Karel Zak from comment #5) > (In reply to Hanns-Joachim Uhl from comment #4) > > If this would be possible, please provide the rpm _for 390x_ ... > > Sure, unofficial and for testing only (src and 390 rpms): > http://people.redhat.com/kzak/bz1766091/ > > Look forward for your feedback, thanks. . Hello Red Hat / Karel, ... thanks for the rpms ... but you only provided the 's390' rpms ... ... please also provide the 's390x' rpms for our testing ... Thanks in advance for your support.
Ah, sorry. The s390x rpms provided too.
------- Comment From hannsj_uhl.com 2019-11-20 05:42 EDT------- (In reply to comment #11) > Ah, sorry. The s390x rpms provided too. Comment from Michael Finnegan 2019-11-19 18:23:10 CST For s390x verify No lsmem User process faults reported since installing util-linux-2.23.2-61.el7_7.1.s390x Thanks
Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2019:3983