Bug 176697 - Review Request: i386-rtems4.7-binutils
Summary: Review Request: i386-rtems4.7-binutils
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review   
(Show other bugs)
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it
QA Contact: Fedora Package Reviews List
Depends On:
Blocks: FE-DEADREVIEW 176712
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
Reported: 2005-12-30 07:32 UTC by Ralf Corsepius
Modified: 2008-01-19 22:02 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Last Closed: 2007-02-20 10:57:19 UTC
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---

Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Ralf Corsepius 2005-12-30 07:32:34 UTC
Spec: http://ftp.skynet.be/pub/packman/fedora/SRPMS/i386-rtems4.7-binutils.spec
SRPM: http://ftp.skynet.be/pub/packman/fedora/SRPMS/i386-rtems4.7-binutils-2.16.1-0.20051229.1.src.rpm

RTEMS is an OS for embedded systems. This is the GNU binutils targetting i386-rtems4.7 (i.e. linux->i386-rtems4.7 cross-binutils).

I plan to submit a corresponding cross-gcc in near future. Further cross toolchains may follow, should the i386-rtems4.7 toolchain be accepted.

Comment 1 Jason Tibbitts 2006-07-07 19:38:15 UTC
Trying to get FE-GUIDELINES blockers right; sorry for the spam.

Comment 2 Anthony Green 2006-07-13 23:59:55 UTC
I was thinking of contributing a cross toolchain for me treo.  Rather than fill
Extras with independent GNU ports, does it make sense to collaborate on a
cross-(binutils|gcc|etc) SRPM that builds various binary toolchains from the
single set of sources?  I think that would be nice.

Comment 3 Ralf Corsepius 2007-02-20 10:57:19 UTC
No feedback > 1 year.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.