Bug 176697 - Review Request: i386-rtems4.7-binutils
Review Request: i386-rtems4.7-binutils
Status: CLOSED CANTFIX
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review (Show other bugs)
rawhide
All Linux
medium Severity medium
: ---
: ---
Assigned To: Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it
Fedora Package Reviews List
:
Depends On:
Blocks: FE-DEADREVIEW 176712
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2005-12-30 02:32 EST by Ralf Corsepius
Modified: 2008-01-19 17:02 EST (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2007-02-20 05:57:19 EST
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---


Attachments (Terms of Use)

  None (edit)
Description Ralf Corsepius 2005-12-30 02:32:34 EST
Spec: http://ftp.skynet.be/pub/packman/fedora/SRPMS/i386-rtems4.7-binutils.spec
SRPM: http://ftp.skynet.be/pub/packman/fedora/SRPMS/i386-rtems4.7-binutils-2.16.1-0.20051229.1.src.rpm

Description:
RTEMS is an OS for embedded systems. This is the GNU binutils targetting i386-rtems4.7 (i.e. linux->i386-rtems4.7 cross-binutils).

I plan to submit a corresponding cross-gcc in near future. Further cross toolchains may follow, should the i386-rtems4.7 toolchain be accepted.
Comment 1 Jason Tibbitts 2006-07-07 15:38:15 EDT
Trying to get FE-GUIDELINES blockers right; sorry for the spam.
Comment 2 Anthony Green 2006-07-13 19:59:55 EDT
I was thinking of contributing a cross toolchain for me treo.  Rather than fill
Extras with independent GNU ports, does it make sense to collaborate on a
cross-(binutils|gcc|etc) SRPM that builds various binary toolchains from the
single set of sources?  I think that would be nice.
Comment 3 Ralf Corsepius 2007-02-20 05:57:19 EST
No feedback > 1 year.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.