Bug 1773812
| Summary: | [DOCS] Add information about applying a routeSelector into Router Default | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | OpenShift Container Platform | Reporter: | Suresh <sgaikwad> |
| Component: | Documentation | Assignee: | Jesse Dohmann <jdohmann> |
| Status: | CLOSED DEFERRED | QA Contact: | Hongan Li <hongli> |
| Severity: | high | Docs Contact: | Latha S <lmurthy> |
| Priority: | high | ||
| Version: | 4.2.0 | CC: | bmcelvee, dramseur, jboxman, jdohmann, lmurthy, nmalik |
| Target Milestone: | --- | Keywords: | ServiceDeliveryImpact |
| Target Release: | 4.2.z | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2022-08-05 20:37:43 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
|
Description
Suresh
2019-11-19 01:42:46 UTC
So this from the link:
"By default, the default router have not routeSelector (remember the spec:{} from above?), and for this reason is exposed not only to our internal router, also is exposed to the default."
And if that isn't desirable, then:
"For ONLY expose the routes of *.internalapps to one router (the internal router), and avoid to the default router (that expose the *.apps routes normally), a routeSelector must be defined into the ingresscontroller “default” in the namespace of openshift-ingress-operator:"
So is the use of `routeSelector` what makes this feature "route sharding"?
Thanks.
Hi Brandi, Can you take a look at this? Thanks! Hey Jason, I'll take this one on. Thanks! @bmcelvee - please provide an update on this item. Thanks! The needinfo request[s] on this closed bug have been removed as they have been unresolved for 365 days |