Bug 17900 - problem mounting a partition via it's label
Summary: problem mounting a partition via it's label
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Linux
Classification: Retired
Component: anaconda
Version: 7.0
Hardware: i386
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Erik Troan
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
: 18263 (view as bug list)
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2000-09-27 00:09 UTC by Need Real Name
Modified: 2008-05-01 15:37 UTC (History)
5 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2000-10-09 22:10:28 UTC
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)
installing error (760 bytes, text/html)
2001-07-11 08:35 UTC, cuongnv
no flags Details

Description Need Real Name 2000-09-27 00:09:23 UTC
hey,
  Upon reboot, after doing a clean install of guinness (7.0), mount failed
to mount
a partition  in my fstab file.  mount attempts to mount the partition based
on it's
label, what appears to be RedHat's new method.  it appears that the label
redhat gives the partition is 1 character too long.

my comments begin with a ~
------------info-----------------
[root@zumpano dafra]# rpm -q mount
mount-2.10m-5
[root@zumpano dafra]# uname -a
Linux zumpano.fc.hp.com 2.2.16-22smp #1 SMP Tue Aug 22 16:39:21 EDT 2000
i686 unknown
[root@zumpano dafra]# /sbin/e2label /dev/sda6 
/var/spool/syste
[root@zumpano dafra]# mount -L /var/spool/syste /var/spool/systemimager
mount: no such partition found
[root@zumpano dafra]# mount /dev/sda6 /var/spool/systemimager
[root@zumpano dafra]# umount /dev/sda6

~ok, so it mounts ok using the device name.  maybe the label is corrupted?
~let's try a different label

[root@zumpano dafra]# /sbin/e2label /dev/sda6 sysimg
[root@zumpano dafra]# mount -L sysimg /var/spool/systemimager

~success!  let's try the old label again.

[root@zumpano dafra]# /sbin/e2label /dev/sda6 /var/spool/syste        
[root@zumpano dafra]# umount /var/spool/systemimager
[root@zumpano dafra]# mount -L /var/spool/syste /var/spool/systemimager
mount: no such partition found

~boo!  what if it the label is one character shorter?

[root@zumpano dafra]# /sbin/e2label /dev/sda6 /var/spool/syst 
[root@zumpano dafra]# mount -L /var/spool/syst /var/spool/systemimager
[root@zumpano dafra]# 

~worked!
--------end info------------------12

-dann
daniel_frazier

Comment 1 olivier kurzweg 2000-10-01 21:40:26 UTC
Same prob with me. I can't boot without changing the labels manually... to a 
shorter version. I'm wondering how this went unoticed through the beta tests 
(mounting /var/spool/mqueue on a separate partition is not that uncommon!).

Comment 2 Bernhard Rosenkraenzer 2000-10-01 22:08:58 UTC
Since ext2 doesn't support unlimited length labels, there's nothing we can do
about it in mount...
Assigning to anaconda so we can make sure we don't try to generate too long
labels.

Comment 3 Michael Fulbright 2000-10-04 22:17:59 UTC
*** Bug 18263 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 4 Brock Organ 2000-10-05 13:00:30 UTC
internal tests show label handling is done more gracefully ...

Here is an example fstab w/truncated labels:

LABEL=/                 /                       ext2    defaults        1 1     
/dev/cdrom              /mnt/cdrom              iso9660 noauto,owner,ro 0 0     
/dev/fd0                /mnt/floppy             auto    noauto,owner    0 0     
LABEL=/mnt/thequickbr   /mnt/thequickbrownfoxjumped ext2    defaults        1 2 
LABEL=/mnt/thequickb1   /mnt/thequickbrownfoxjumpedoverthe ext2   
defaults        1 2
LABEL=/mnt/thequickb2   /mnt/thequickbrownfoxjumpedoverthebrassy ext2   
defaults        1 2
LABEL=/mnt/thequickb3   /mnt/thequickbrownfoxjumpedovertheclassy ext2   
defaults        1 2
LABEL=/mnt/thequickb4   /mnt/thequickbrownfoxjumpedoverthesnazzy ext2   
defaults        1 2
none                    /proc                   proc    defaults        0 0     
none                    /dev/pts                devpts  gid=5,mode=620  0 0     
/dev/hda5               swap                    swap    defaults        0
0                                  


Comment 5 Brock Organ 2000-10-05 13:02:58 UTC
the testing above is referring to a proposed fix being tested internally ...

Comment 6 Erik Troan 2000-10-05 13:05:11 UTC
This is a bug in e2fsprogs and mount. New packages are in testing, and the
patches have been fed to the software maintainers. We're also working on an
install updates disk which will not use labels longer then 15 characters to help
workaround this problem for 7.0. These updates should be available soon. In the
meantime, changing the labels to be 15 characters with e2label and updating the
fstab will let your system operate properly.

Comment 7 olivier kurzweg 2000-10-05 13:17:48 UTC
It seems that the pratical limit is 14 characters instead of 15:
# e2label /dev/hda5 /var/spool/squid       ==> 15 characters-label
Edit /etc/fstab and put LABEL=/var/spool/squid     /var/spool/squid ....
# mount /var/spool/squid
mount: no such partition found
#

Now, let's try 14 characters instead
# e2label /dev/hda5 /var/spool/squi       ==> 14 characters-label
Edit /etc/fstab and put LABEL=/var/spool/squi     /var/spool/squid ....
# mount /var/spool/squid
#   ==> mount succeeded

Comment 8 Michael Fulbright 2000-10-09 22:10:21 UTC
Fixed in errata RHBA-2000:084-02.

Comment 9 cuongnv 2001-07-11 08:10:54 UTC
Traceback (innermost last):
 
File "/var/tmp/anaconda-7.0.1//usr/lib/anaconda/iw/progress_gui.py",
line 20, in run
    rc = self.todo.doInstall ()
  File "/var/tmp/anaconda-7.0.1//usr/lib/anaconda/todo.py", 
line 1472, in doInstall
    self.fstab.mountFilesystems (self.instPath)
  File "/var/tmp/anaconda-7.0.1//usr/lib/anaconda/fstab.py", 
line 713, in mountFilesystems
    raise SystemError, (errno, msg)
SystemError: (22, 'Invalid argument')

Local variables in innermost frame:
size: 56227
fsystem: ext2
self: <fstab.GuiFstab instance at 8497fe8>
msg: Invalid argument
doFormat: 0
errno: 22
device: hda3
instPath: /mnt/sysimage
mntpoint: /boot

ToDo object:
(itodo
ToDo
p1
(dp2
S'method'
p3
(iimage
CdromInstallMethod
p4
(dp5
S'progressWindow'
p6

<failed>


Comment 10 cuongnv 2001-07-11 08:35:42 UTC
Created attachment 23267 [details]
installing error


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.