Bug 179976 - nothing owns rpmbuild
nothing owns rpmbuild
Status: CLOSED NOTABUG
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: rpm (Show other bugs)
rawhide
All Linux
medium Severity medium
: ---
: ---
Assigned To: Paul Nasrat
Mike McLean
:
Depends On:
Blocks:
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2006-02-04 00:32 EST by Dave Jones
Modified: 2015-01-04 17:24 EST (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2006-02-06 17:49:00 EST
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---


Attachments (Terms of Use)

  None (edit)
Description Dave Jones 2006-02-04 00:32:59 EST
$ rpm -qf `which rpmbuild`
file /usr/bin/rpmbuild is not owned by any package
$ file /usr/bin/rpmbuild
/usr/bin/rpmbuild: symbolic link to `../lib/rpm/rpmb'

Actually most of /usr/lib/rpm is unowned..

file /usr/lib/rpm/brp-compress is not owned by any package
file /usr/lib/rpm/brp-java-gcjcompile is not owned by any package
file /usr/lib/rpm/brp-python-bytecompile is not owned by any package
file /usr/lib/rpm/brp-redhat is not owned by any package
file /usr/lib/rpm/brp-sparc64-linux is not owned by any package
file /usr/lib/rpm/brp-strip is not owned by any package
file /usr/lib/rpm/brp-strip-comment-note is not owned by any package
file /usr/lib/rpm/brp-strip-shared is not owned by any package
file /usr/lib/rpm/brp-strip-static-archive is not owned by any package
file /usr/lib/rpm/check-files is not owned by any package
file /usr/lib/rpm/check-prereqs is not owned by any package
file /usr/lib/rpm/config.site is not owned by any package
file /usr/lib/rpm/cross-build is not owned by any package
file /usr/lib/rpm/debugedit is not owned by any package
file /usr/lib/rpm/find-debuginfo.sh is not owned by any package
file /usr/lib/rpm/find-lang.sh is not owned by any package
file /usr/lib/rpm/find-provides is not owned by any package
file /usr/lib/rpm/find-provides.perl is not owned by any package
file /usr/lib/rpm/find-prov.pl is not owned by any package
file /usr/lib/rpm/find-req.pl is not owned by any package
file /usr/lib/rpm/find-requires is not owned by any package
file /usr/lib/rpm/find-requires.perl is not owned by any package
file /usr/lib/rpm/get_magic.pl is not owned by any package
file /usr/lib/rpm/getpo.sh is not owned by any package
file /usr/lib/rpm/http.req is not owned by any package
file /usr/lib/rpm/javadeps is not owned by any package
file /usr/lib/rpm/magic is not owned by any package
file /usr/lib/rpm/magic.mgc is not owned by any package
file /usr/lib/rpm/magic.mime is not owned by any package
file /usr/lib/rpm/magic.mime.mgc is not owned by any package
file /usr/lib/rpm/magic.prov is not owned by any package
file /usr/lib/rpm/magic.req is not owned by any package
file /usr/lib/rpm/perldeps.pl is not owned by any package
file /usr/lib/rpm/perl.prov is not owned by any package
file /usr/lib/rpm/perl.req is not owned by any package
file /usr/lib/rpm/pythondeps.sh is not owned by any package
file /usr/lib/rpm/rpmb is not owned by any package
file /usr/lib/rpm/rpmdeps is not owned by any package
file /usr/lib/rpm/rpmt is not owned by any package
file /usr/lib/rpm/trpm is not owned by any package
file /usr/lib/rpm/u_pkg.sh is not owned by any package
file /usr/lib/rpm/vpkg-provides2.sh is not owned by any package
file /usr/lib/rpm/vpkg-provides.sh is not owned by any package
Comment 1 Paul Nasrat 2006-02-04 10:26:30 EST
[pauln@enki ~]$ rpm -qf /usr/lib/rpm/find-lang.sh
rpm-build-4.4.2-15.i386
[pauln@enki ~]$ rpm -qf /usr/bin/rpmbuild
rpm-build-4.4.2-15.i386

Those are the contents of the rpm-build package, are you sure your rpmdb isn't
screwed up or you did rpm -e --justdb rpm-build or something?
Comment 2 Dave Jones 2006-02-05 02:40:46 EST
they become 'owned' when you install 'rpmbuild'.
Why are these even present when that package isn't there?

and why are we installing brp-sparc64-linux ?

Comment 3 Paul Nasrat 2006-02-06 10:51:04 EST
They shouldn't be present, did your system crash/hang mid update at anypoint it
looks as if the package was missing from the db with the files on disk.  A
default install will not have these around.
Comment 4 Dave Jones 2006-02-06 17:49:00 EST
maybe, I'll do a reinstall when the next test release comes out, and reopen this
if needed.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.