Bug 180483 - Multipath.conf listed defaults are not actual defaults
Summary: Multipath.conf listed defaults are not actual defaults
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 4
Classification: Red Hat
Component: device-mapper-multipath
Version: 4.0
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
: ---
Assignee: Ben Marzinski
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: 181409
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2006-02-08 15:45 UTC by Rod Nayfield
Modified: 2010-01-12 02:23 UTC (History)
11 users (show)

Fixed In Version: RHEA-2006-0513
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2006-08-10 21:44:50 UTC
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHEA-2006:0513 0 normal SHIPPED_LIVE device-mapper-multipath enhancement update 2006-08-10 04:00:00 UTC

Description Rod Nayfield 2006-02-08 15:45:33 UTC
Description of problem:

/etc/multipath.conf contains commented-out defaults.  However, these are not the
actual defaults.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
U3 beta

How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Configure default install per http://people.redhat.com/nayfield/storage
2. multipath -ll
  
Actual results:

two priority groups, one path per group
 (aka 'failover')

Expected results:

one priority group, with two paths 
 (aka 'multibus')

Additional info:

either multibus should be used as the default,
-or-
multipath.conf should show that failover is the default

storage is 
Vendor: DotHill  Model: SANnet RAID X300 Rev: 0315

Comment 4 Alasdair Kergon 2006-03-03 17:02:30 UTC
Yep: Put a comment at the top of the multipath.conf file explaining that these are
just examples.  And pointing the user to multipath.annotated.conf for
instructions and multipath.defaults.conf for the default settings.

Comment 7 Ben Marzinski 2006-04-19 18:57:16 UTC
Fixed. There is now a note at the top of the config file

Comment 11 Red Hat Bugzilla 2006-08-10 21:44:53 UTC
An advisory has been issued which should help the problem
described in this bug report. This report is therefore being
closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information
on the solution and/or where to find the updated files,
please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report
if the solution does not work for you.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2006-0513.html



Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.