Bug 184407 - parted print does not always show that a partition contains an ext3 fs
Summary: parted print does not always show that a partition contains an ext3 fs
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED WONTFIX
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 4
Classification: Red Hat
Component: parted
Version: 4.0
Hardware: i386
OS: Linux
medium
low
Target Milestone: ---
: ---
Assignee: Joel Andres Granados
QA Contact: Brock Organ
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2006-03-08 16:27 UTC by bastiaan
Modified: 2023-09-14 01:10 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2008-09-24 12:38:47 UTC
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description bastiaan 2006-03-08 16:27:13 UTC
From Bugzilla Helper:
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20060202 Fedora/1.0.7-1.2.fc4 Firefox/1.0.7

Description of problem:
'parted /dev/sdX print' outputs a list with all partitions on the specified disk. The list contains a column 'Filesystem' that shows which filesystem is installed on the partition.
However for some disks parted fails to show that a partition contains an (ext3) filesystem.
 

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
1.6.19-1.EL

How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. parted /dev/sdah print
2.
3.
  

Actual Results:  Disk geometry for /dev/sdah: 0.000-143370.000 megabytes
Disk label type: msdos
Minor    Start       End     Type      Filesystem  Flags
1          0.016 143370.000  primary


Expected Results:  Disk geometry for /dev/sdah: 0.000-143370.000 megabytes
Disk label type: msdos
Minor    Start       End     Type      Filesystem  Flags
1          0.016 143370.000  primary   ext3


Additional info:

fdisk -l output:
Disk /dev/sdah: 150.3 GB, 150334341120 bytes
64 heads, 32 sectors/track, 143370 cylinders
Units = cylinders of 2048 * 512 = 1048576 bytes

    Device Boot      Start         End      Blocks   Id  System
/dev/sdah1               1      143370   146810864   83  Linux

The disk is a SAN snapshot of a volume in use on a RHEL3 box. Parted does show the filesystem information for a SAN snapshot of another volume used by the same system.

Comment 1 RHEL Program Management 2007-11-29 04:26:13 UTC
This request was evaluated by Red Hat Product Management for inclusion in a Red
Hat Enterprise Linux maintenance release.  Product Management has requested
further review of this request by Red Hat Engineering, for potential
inclusion in a Red Hat Enterprise Linux Update release for currently deployed
products.  This request is not yet committed for inclusion in an Update
release.

Comment 3 Joel Andres Granados 2008-05-26 13:42:44 UTC
Is this an issue that was introduced in recent versions of RHEL4?.  If so, what
version of parted worked?  What I want to address in this question is the time
in which the bug was introduced.  Going from 3 to 4 doesn't give me a lot of
information on where the bug might be as a *lot* of changes happened from one
release to another.  Did you see it in RHEL4.{1,2,3,4,5,6,7}

Is it possible for you to attach the first 1024 bytes of the image.  this might
be useful in debugging the situation.


Comment 4 bastiaan 2008-05-26 13:58:59 UTC
Hi Joel, 

This issue was not introduced in recent versions of RHEL4. As you can see the
bug was filed in March 2006 against parted 1.6.19-1.EL. I don't know exactly
which RHEL release that is but I suspect RHEL4 <= 4.2. 
Unfortunately the affected configuration is not available anymore for me to test
with, so I cannot send you the first 1k of the image.



Comment 5 Joel Andres Granados 2008-06-10 14:59:45 UTC
very similar issue in 52 250717

Comment 7 Alexander Todorov 2008-09-03 10:55:55 UTC
I can't reproduce this bug. Can you post consistent steps to reproduce? 
What's on the disk, what's the disk layout (LVM, partitions, etc.) ? 
We need more information in order to address this issue.

Comment 9 RHEL Program Management 2008-09-24 12:38:47 UTC
Development Management has reviewed and declined this request.  You may appeal
this decision by reopening this request.

Comment 10 Red Hat Bugzilla 2023-09-14 01:10:22 UTC
The needinfo request[s] on this closed bug have been removed as they have been unresolved for 1000 days


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.