Bug 189803 - multipath -ll does not show path checker type
Summary: multipath -ll does not show path checker type
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 4
Classification: Red Hat
Component: device-mapper-multipath
Version: 4.0
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
: ---
Assignee: Ben Marzinski
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2006-04-24 19:57 UTC by Sam Knuth
Modified: 2010-01-12 02:25 UTC (History)
10 users (show)

Fixed In Version: RHEA-2007-0256
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2007-05-01 17:36:11 UTC
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHEA-2007:0256 0 normal SHIPPED_LIVE device-mapper-multipath enhancement update 2007-05-01 17:35:42 UTC

Description Sam Knuth 2006-04-24 19:57:41 UTC
Description of problem:

multipath -ll does not show the path checking type that is currently in use, as
the man page indicates it should.

From "man multipath":
--
-ll    show the current multipath topology from all available information
(sysfs, the device mapper, path checkers ...)
--
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
Name                                    Version        Rel
----------------------------------------------------------
device-mapper-multipath                 0.4.5          12.0.RHEL4        i386


How reproducible:
Always
  
Actual results:
# multipath -ll
1IBM_____2105____________31329320
[size=14 GB][features="0"][hwhandler="0"]
\_ round-robin 0 [active]
\_ 1:0:0:0  sdb 8:16   [active][ready]
\_ 2:0:0:0  sdo 8:224  [active][ready]

1IBM_____2105____________51329320
[size=14 GB][features="0"][hwhandler="0"]
\_ round-robin 0 [active]
\_ 1:0:0:2  sdd 8:48   [active][ready]
\_ 2:0:0:2  sdq 65:0   [active][ready]

1IBM_____2105____________11429320
[size=14 GB][features="0"][hwhandler="0"]
\_ round-robin 0 [active]
\_ 1:0:0:4  sdf 8:80   [active][ready]
\_ 2:0:0:4  sds 65:32  [active][ready]

1IBM_____2105____________31429320
[size=14 GB][features="0"][hwhandler="0"]
\_ round-robin 0 [active]
\_ 1:0:0:6  sdh 8:112  [active][ready]
\_ 2:0:0:6  sdu 65:64  [active][ready]

1IBM_____2105____________51429320
[size=14 GB][features="0"][hwhandler="0"]
\_ round-robin 0 [active]
\_ 1:0:0:8  sdj 8:144  [active][ready]
\_ 2:0:0:8  sdw 65:96  [active][ready]

1IBM_____2105____________40A29320
[size=7 GB][features="0"][hwhandler="0"]
\_ round-robin 0 [active]
\_ 1:0:0:12 sdn 8:208  [active][ready]

1IBM_____2105____________11529320
[size=14 GB][features="0"][hwhandler="0"]
\_ round-robin 0 [active]
\_ 1:0:0:10 sdl 8:176  [active][ready]
\_ 2:0:0:10 sdy 65:128 [active][ready]

1IBM_____2105____________41329320
[size=14 GB][features="0"][hwhandler="0"]
\_ round-robin 0 [active]
\_ 1:0:0:1  sdc 8:32   [active][ready]
\_ 2:0:0:1  sdp 8:240  [active][ready]

1IBM_____2105____________01429320
[size=14 GB][features="0"][hwhandler="0"]
\_ round-robin 0 [active]
\_ 1:0:0:3  sde 8:64   [active][ready]
\_ 2:0:0:3  sdr 65:16  [active][ready]

1IBM_____2105____________21429320
[size=14 GB][features="0"][hwhandler="0"]
\_ round-robin 0 [active]
\_ 1:0:0:5  sdg 8:96   [active][ready]
\_ 2:0:0:5  sdt 65:48  [active][ready]

1IBM_____2105____________41429320
[size=14 GB][features="0"][hwhandler="0"]
\_ round-robin 0 [active]
\_ 1:0:0:7  sdi 8:128  [active][ready]
\_ 2:0:0:7  sdv 65:80  [active][ready]

1IBM_____2105____________01529320
[size=14 GB][features="0"][hwhandler="0"]
\_ round-robin 0 [active]
\_ 1:0:0:9  sdk 8:160  [active][ready]
\_ 2:0:0:9  sdx 65:112 [active][ready]

1IBM_____2105____________21529320
[size=14 GB][features="0"][hwhandler="0"]
\_ round-robin 0 [active]
\_ 1:0:0:11 sdm 8:192  [active][ready]
\_ 2:0:0:11 sdz 65:144 [active][ready]

Expected results:

It should show if the path_checker is "tur" or "readsector0"
Additional info:

Comment 2 Ben Marzinski 2006-09-15 20:07:14 UTC
The man page has been corrected.

Comment 3 Ben Marzinski 2007-01-31 17:04:03 UTC
Just a man page fix. No testing issues

Comment 9 Red Hat Bugzilla 2007-05-01 17:36:11 UTC
An advisory has been issued which should help the problem
described in this bug report. This report is therefore being
closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information
on the solution and/or where to find the updated files,
please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report
if the solution does not work for you.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2007-0256.html



Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.