Bug 190618 - Follow glibc conventions for nss modules
Summary: Follow glibc conventions for nss modules
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 4
Classification: Red Hat
Component: samba
Version: 4.0
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: rc
: ---
Assignee: Simo Sorce
QA Contact: David Lawrence
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On: 177123
Blocks: 176344
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2006-05-03 23:14 UTC by Xixi
Modified: 2018-10-20 00:50 UTC (History)
8 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2009-03-18 17:28:04 UTC
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)
samba-correct-sonames-spec.patch (2.31 KB, patch)
2007-03-27 12:04 UTC, Jose Plans
no flags Details | Diff


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Samba Project 3381 0 None None None Never

Comment 2 RHEL Program Management 2006-08-18 16:01:20 UTC
This request was evaluated by Red Hat Product Management for inclusion in a Red
Hat Enterprise Linux maintenance release.  Product Management has requested
further review of this request by Red Hat Engineering, for potential
inclusion in a Red Hat Enterprise Linux Update release for currently deployed
products.  This request is not yet committed for inclusion in an Update
release.

Comment 6 Guenther Deschner 2007-03-27 10:46:55 UTC
Can anyone in the CC: list provide a little more input on this bug?

Comment 7 Jose Plans 2007-03-27 12:02:32 UTC
Sure,
 `rpm -e --nodeps samba-common` leaves the symlinks generated during the install
(.spec) broken as we just remove them. The patch from the other Bugzilla fixes
this but wrongly name the libnss_wins*.so files using install and %{VERSION}
resulting in libnss_wins-3.0.10.so.

 

Comment 8 Jose Plans 2007-03-27 12:04:19 UTC
Created attachment 151017 [details]
samba-correct-sonames-spec.patch

Guenther,
  That's the patch I was mentioning.
Jose

Comment 9 RHEL Program Management 2007-04-17 21:16:32 UTC
Although this bugzilla was approved for RHEL 4.5, we were unable
to resolve it in time to be included in the release.  Therefore
it is now proposed for RHEL 4.6.

Comment 10 RHEL Program Management 2007-05-09 10:26:24 UTC
This request was evaluated by Red Hat Product Management for inclusion in a Red
Hat Enterprise Linux maintenance release.  Product Management has requested
further review of this request by Red Hat Engineering, for potential
inclusion in a Red Hat Enterprise Linux Update release for currently deployed
products.  This request is not yet committed for inclusion in an Update
release.

Comment 11 Nalin Dahyabhai 2007-07-05 18:29:50 UTC
We don't have this in RHEL 5 or the development tree, so I don't think we should
do this for RHEL 4 yet.  Leaving the flags as they are so that we'll roll this
one over.

Comment 12 Pete Graner 2007-09-07 20:38:28 UTC
Per comment #11, moving to 4.7

Comment 13 RHEL Program Management 2007-11-29 04:25:54 UTC
This request was evaluated by Red Hat Product Management for inclusion in a Red
Hat Enterprise Linux maintenance release.  Product Management has requested
further review of this request by Red Hat Engineering, for potential
inclusion in a Red Hat Enterprise Linux Update release for currently deployed
products.  This request is not yet committed for inclusion in an Update
release.

Comment 14 RHEL Program Management 2008-09-18 19:16:47 UTC
This request was evaluated by Red Hat Product Management for inclusion in a Red
Hat Enterprise Linux maintenance release.  Product Management has requested
further review of this request by Red Hat Engineering, for potential
inclusion in a Red Hat Enterprise Linux Update release for currently deployed
products.  This request is not yet committed for inclusion in an Update
release.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.