Red Hat Bugzilla – Bug 190930
seahorse nautilus plugin issue
Last modified: 2007-11-30 17:11:32 EST
Description of problem: Well, it might be this is more a feature request than a problem, or it might be I miss something, anyway, here we go. The new items in the nautilus menu, added by seahorse, allow to sign or to encrypt file, but not to encrypt _and_ sign, like GPA file manager is doing. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 0.8-1.fc4 How reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. Try to encrypt a file from nautilus 2. 3. Actual results: There is no request of signing also the file, usually via checkbox (like GPA). Expected results: The possibility of signing the file and the encrypt it, like: gpg --sign --encrypt ... Additional info: It might be interesting to see if seahorse 0.9.1 adds this feature.
yah - not much to be done on that here. would you be willing to open this bug upstream with seahorse? thanks
(In reply to comment #1) > yah - not much to be done on that here. > > would you be willing to open this bug upstream with seahorse? Uhm, my understand was that, being an FC user, I have to "request" improvements here and then the maintainer, which is supposed to know better, will take the proper actions (report upstream, create a patch, and so on). So, to answer to your question, no :-) I do not want to feed the request upstream, in this case (unless really really necessary). Since I consider this an improvement for Fedora, I guess you should evaluate if it makes sense and decide what to do. Keep in mind that gpa does already everything, it only lacks the nautilus integration, so either seahorse offers a valid alternative, or it should be dropped completely. Anyway, thanks for your understanding.