I installed a fresh copy of RH 7.0 and am having some font problems. If I look at the page http://www.cnn.com/2000/TECH/computing/10/15/internetfiltering.ap/index.html the widths look incorrect, and possibly the heights, but not by as much. Here are the XFree86 RPMS I have installed XFree86-xfs-4.0.1-1 XFree86-tools-4.0.1-1 XFree86-V4L-4.0.1-1 XFree86-4.0.1-1 XFree86-75dpi-fonts-4.0.1-1 XFree86-twm-4.0.1-1 XFree86-doc-4.0.1-1 XFree86-100dpi-fonts-4.0.1-1 XFree86-libs-4.0.1-1 XFree86-devel-4.0.1-1 XFree86-xdm-4.0.1-1 I am using xinerama on two 19" Optiquest V95 monitors. It functions correctly.
Created attachment 4227 [details] This is a small clip of netscape
Does rpm --erase abiword fix it ?
I don't have abiword installed.
I've had this problem before, and remeber reading something about why it happens. I seem to recall that netscape is rather stupid about the way it chooses what size font to use. I think it was something like if a page specified a 10point font then netscape would choose a 10pixel high font. Which if you are running a rather high resolution is not very easy to read, especially if netscape for some reason picks a non-scalable font. Looking at a 10 pixel high, scaled down bitmap font is not fun by any stretch of the imagination. As a workaround under font preferences set it to always use your fonts and override those that the page specifies. It can and will cause some pages to render incorrectly, but at least you can read them. FWIW, mozilla and consequently Netscape 6 whenever it is ready for a real release is much better about this.
I have the same problem, no abiword, 1024x768. I read and tried what is said here: http://people.redhat.com/scoile/fonts/fixing.html http://home.c2i.net/dark/linux.html#ttf http://www.linuxdoc.org/HOWTO/mini/FDU/apps.html#AEN480 and installed windows ttf. www.cnn.com (which I used as a test) is far better now, but the css .blue + bold used for important link is still very ugly. <span class="blue" style="font-weight: bold;"> .blue {font-size:12px; font-family:arial, helvetica, verdana; color:#000099} Maybe in future releases RedHat could do by default something similar to what the links suggest, even because they disagree on some issues and I'm not able to say which is the best, while RedHat should now it better :-)
After six months, this has become moot. I've tried it with 7.1 and it seems better, but still not perfect.
Most likely the dpi XFree86 is seeing your monitor as and the actual DPI of your monitor are not the same. Please attach your XFree86 server logs and your config file via the file attachment link below. Try starting X with the parameter "-dpi <yourdpi>" where yourdpi is the dpi of the video mode/monitor combo. Something like: startx -- -dpi 100 If that doesn't change anything, try uninstalling the 100dpi fonts and installing the 75 dpi fonts instead, or vice versa. Restart both xfs and XFree86 in between any changes.
This is almost definitely due to monitor DPI calculations giving different vert/horiz DPI. You need to specify your width/height in your config to fix this.
I consider this a special case configuration issue. All distorted font issues seem to be fixed by using advice contained above for other users experiencing these sort of problems, in particular all of the recommended solutions are: 1) Removing from font path 75dpi/100dpi scaled fonts, leaving only the unscaled versions. 2) Calculating the monitor's DPI and starting X with -dpi or by using the DisplaySize in XF86Config-4 to specify monitor dimensions. 3) Only installing either the 75 dpi font or the 100dpi font depending on what specific DPI more closely matches that of the given monitor size, and resolution settings.