Red Hat Bugzilla – Bug 192016
[FC5] LTC23920-SCIM XIM server returns unexpected data
Last modified: 2007-11-30 17:11:32 EST
LTC Owner is: email@example.com
LTC Originator is: firstname.lastname@example.org
Machine: PPC64 (xclient), IA32 (xserver)
Is this reproducible? => Yes
Is the system (not just the application) hung? => No
Did the system produce an OOPS message on the console? => No
SCIM XIM server returns unexpected data on cross-platform
I tried to connect to FC5 for PPC64 from FC5 for IA32 via SSH
My test program(ximtest.c) returns unexpected data.
Because of this situation, this program does not start.
Console log is as follows:
[ppc64]$ cc -o ximtest ximtest.c -lX11
[ppc64]$ export XMODIFIERS=@im=SCIM
fevent = 0x3000000
X Error of failed request: BadValue (integer parameter out of range for operation)
Major opcode of failed request: 2 (X_ChangeWindowAttributes)
Value in failed request: 0x3200000
Serial number of failed request: 40
Current serial number in output stream: 41
When I run same program on IA32 machine, I got following result:
[i686]$ cc -o ximtest ximtest.c -lX11
fevent = 0x3
I think ppc64's "fevent = 0x3000000" should be "fevent = 0x3".
I think it's byte-swap problem.
Created an attachment (id=16915)
Created attachment 129268 [details]
This should be filed against the "scim" component instead of "xorg-x11".
Please file bugs against the correct component to ensure the correct
maintainer receives them.
Thanks in advance.
----- Additional Comments From email@example.com 2006-05-22 11:26 EDT -------
"1st patch for this bug" works fine for this problem.
Sorry for the slow response - just saw this report now.
(In reply to comment #3)
> ----- Additional Comments From firstname.lastname@example.org 2006-05-22 11:26 EDT -------
> "1st patch for this bug" works fine for this problem.
What patch is this referring to?
Created attachment 152077 [details]
----- Additional Comments From email@example.com 2007-04-09 21:10 EDT -------
1st patch for this bug.
Hello, Red Hat team.
> What patch is this referring to?
Please find the patch as attached this comment.
This patch is already in scim-1.4.5 upstream. Moving to FC6.
and in FC6 scim.