Bug 192181 - openoffice apps reliably segfaults immediagely on this computer
Summary: openoffice apps reliably segfaults immediagely on this computer
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 191992
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: openoffice.org
Version: 5
Hardware: x86_64
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Caolan McNamara
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2006-05-18 06:57 UTC by Mike Olsen
Modified: 2007-11-30 22:11 UTC (History)
0 users

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2006-05-18 09:00:42 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Mike Olsen 2006-05-18 06:57:19 UTC
Description of problem:


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
openoffice.org-core02-2.0.3-163 (FC5 on x86_64)

How reproducible:
Very

Steps to Reproduce:
1. at command line, issue the command:

oowriter

 
Actual results:
/usr/lib/openoffice.org2.0/program/soffice: line 151:  3729 Segmentation fault 
   "$sd_prog/$sd_binary" "$@"


Expected results:
Usual openoffice startup

Additional info:
-- Openoffice works just fine on my kids fc5.i386 
-- ran the "testgl.c" coding talked about in the FAQ, answer is \
All OK
-- firefox works just fine (though it does seem to be working as lib64 version).

The /var/log/messages file contains the following lines following the segfault:

May 18 00:03:12 kyzyl kernel: IA32 syscall 311 from javaldx not implemented
May 18 00:03:12 kyzyl kernel: IA32 syscall 311 from swriter.bin not implemented
May 18 00:03:12 kyzyl kernel: swriter.bin[4491]: segfault at 0000000000000000
rip 00000000f6595871 rsp 00000000ffffbadc error 4

Comment 1 Thomas Woerner 2006-05-18 08:53:14 UTC
I think this should be filed agains openoffice.

Comment 2 Caolan McNamara 2006-05-18 09:00:42 UTC
"openoffice.org-core02-2.0.3-163 (FC5 on x86_64)" is not our rpm. For FC-5 we
have openoffice.org-core-2.0.2-5.9.2, for rawhide it is currently
openoffice.org-core-0.2.0.3-163. That looks like an upstream rpm, not a Fedora
one, yes ?

Nevertheless this sounds like bug 191992

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 191992 ***


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.