Bug 197639 - the conjuction of 0x0d31 + 0x0d4d + 0x200d need be added in the font file of malayalam
Summary: the conjuction of 0x0d31 + 0x0d4d + 0x200d need be added in the font file of...
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: fonts-indic
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Darshan Santani
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2006-07-05 06:54 UTC by Liang Zhang
Modified: 2015-04-07 03:06 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

Fixed In Version: 2.0.1-1
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2006-09-11 06:42:36 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)
Patch attached (1.76 KB, patch)
2006-08-08 12:52 UTC, Darshan Santani
no flags Details | Diff
Screenshot showing the expected behaviour (36.30 KB, image/png)
2006-08-08 12:55 UTC, Darshan Santani
no flags Details
lohit_ml.ttf (52.38 KB, application/octet-stream)
2006-08-08 12:58 UTC, Darshan Santani
no flags Details

Description Liang Zhang 2006-07-05 06:54:34 UTC
Description of problem:
The conjuction of  0x0d31 + 0x0d4d + 0x200d is existing in real world, but it is
not existing in our font file of malayalam.
The conjuction of  0x0d31 + 0x0d4d + 0x200d need be added in the GSUB table of
the font file of malayalam. The glyph of this conjuction is the same as the
conjuction of  0x0d30 + 0x0d4d + 0x200d.

Comment 1 Darshan Santani 2006-08-08 12:52:27 UTC
Created attachment 133783 [details]
Patch attached

Patch has been attached to resolve the issue.

Comment 2 Darshan Santani 2006-08-08 12:55:37 UTC
Created attachment 133784 [details]
Screenshot showing the expected behaviour 

Attached screenshot showing the expected behaviour

Comment 3 Darshan Santani 2006-08-08 12:58:05 UTC
Created attachment 133785 [details]
lohit_ml.ttf

Ani, I am attaching the ttf file, Can you just test it with the modified file
and leave your comments. Thanks in advance.

Comment 4 Leon Ho 2006-08-17 07:19:07 UTC
built in fonts-indic-2.0.1-1

Comment 5 Ani Peter 2006-08-31 13:33:55 UTC
Before Darshan leaving, had discussion with him wanted to have :

(U+0d30) + (U+0d4d) + (U+200d) and (U+0d31) + (U+0d4d) + (U+200d) must give the
same glyph.

In the old font, (U+0d30) + (U+0d4d) + (U+200d) was working but new font
(U+200d) is not present in the keyboard and hence not able to generate the output.

Regards
Ani


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.