Bug 1984427 - rpmdeplint failure: gcc-11.1.1-6.1.el9.i686 provides /usr/libexec/getconf/default which is also provided by gcc-11.1.1-6.1.el9.x86_64
Summary: rpmdeplint failure: gcc-11.1.1-6.1.el9.i686 provides /usr/libexec/getconf/def...
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED NOTABUG
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9
Classification: Red Hat
Component: gcc
Version: 9.0
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: beta
: ---
Assignee: Marek Polacek
QA Contact: qe-baseos-tools-bugs
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2021-07-21 12:24 UTC by Radek Vykydal
Modified: 2023-07-18 14:25 UTC (History)
4 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2021-07-21 13:10:37 UTC
Type: Bug
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Radek Vykydal 2021-07-21 12:24:42 UTC
osci.brew-build.rpmdeplint.functional rpmdeplint test of Anaconda package gating (https://dashboard.osci.redhat.com/#/artifact/brew-build/aid/38201278)
revealed this issue:

Undeclared file conflicts:
gcc-11.1.1-6.1.el9.i686 provides /usr/libexec/getconf/default which is also provided by gcc-11.1.1-6.1.el9.x86_64
gcc-11.1.1-6.1.el9.x86_64 provides /usr/libexec/getconf/default which is also provided by gcc-11.1.1-6.1.el9.i686

http://artifacts.osci.redhat.com/testing-farm/b68d24e5-ae4a-4a59-ac2c-9c7c5d539212/

It may be a tooling / gating infrastructure issue:

http://mailman-int.corp.redhat.com/archives/osci-list/2021-July/msg00101.html

but I filed this BZ to be sure the issue is assessed and handled if really needed.
Please close it if it is not the case.

Comment 1 Radek Vykydal 2021-07-21 12:38:33 UTC
(In reply to Radek Vykydal from comment #0)
 
> http://artifacts.osci.redhat.com/testing-farm/b68d24e5-ae4a-4a59-ac2c-
> 9c7c5d539212/

As you can see in the log it regards also
libstdc++-docs-11.1.1-6.1.el9.i686

Comment 2 Marek Polacek 2021-07-21 13:10:37 UTC
gcc and libstdc++-docs are not multilib packages -- we have one compiler that handles multiple multilibs.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.