Note: This bug is displayed in read-only format because the product is no longer active in Red Hat Bugzilla.
RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.

Bug 1991773

Summary: dlm v4.1.0 should depend on corosync >= v3.1.0
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 Reporter: Reid Wahl <nwahl>
Component: dlmAssignee: David Teigland <teigland>
Status: CLOSED MIGRATED QA Contact: cluster-qe <cluster-qe>
Severity: low Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: 8.4CC: aahringo, anprice, ccaulfie, cluster-maint, jfriesse, sbradley
Target Milestone: betaKeywords: MigratedToJIRA, Triaged
Target Release: ---Flags: pm-rhel: mirror+
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2023-09-23 15:58:35 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Reid Wahl 2021-08-10 00:23:35 UTC
Description of problem:

dlm 4.1.0 requires the quorum_model_initialize function in corosync, which was introduced in corosync v3.1.0. dlm_controld fails to start if an older version of corosync is installed.

Aug  9 22:30:59 node1 pacemaker-execd[91995]: notice: dlm_start_0[92121] error output [ dlm_controld: symbol lookup error: dlm_controld: undefined symbol: quorum_model_initialize ]
Aug  9 22:30:59 node1 pacemaker-controld[91998]: notice: Result of start operation for dlm on node1: not running


See also:
  -  An ocf:pacemaker:controld resource fails to start with "symbol lookup error: dlm_controld: undefined symbol: quorum_model_initialize" in a Pacemaker cluster (https://access.redhat.com/solutions/6250411)


dlm 4.1.0 currently requires only corosync >= 1.99.9.

[root@fastvm-rhel-8-0-23 pacemaker]# rpm -q --requires dlm | grep corosync
corosync >= 1.99.9

-----

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

dlm-4.1.0-1.el8

-----

How reproducible:

Always

-----

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Install dlm-4.1.0-1.el8 and a corosync version less than 3.1.0.
2. Try to start dlm_controld (for example, via the ocf:pacemaker:controld resource agent).

-----

Actual results:

dlm_controld: symbol lookup error: dlm_controld: undefined symbol: quorum_model_initialize

-----

Expected results:

dlm_controld starts without issue.

Comment 1 Reid Wahl 2021-08-10 00:31:23 UTC
quorum: Add support for nodelist callback (https://github.com/corosync/corosync/commit/4eb36297)

https://github.com/corosync/corosync/releases/tag/v3.1.0

Comment 4 Andrew Price 2023-01-12 13:21:38 UTC
Was this bug fixed by the rebase in bug 2133827? If so it should be added to the erratum and depend on that bz.

Comment 5 David Teigland 2023-03-08 18:31:30 UTC
That was a rhel9 update, we don't update the rhel8 package very often, but the next time we do we can include this.

Comment 7 RHEL Program Management 2023-09-23 15:51:52 UTC
Issue migration from Bugzilla to Jira is in process at this time. This will be the last message in Jira copied from the Bugzilla bug.

Comment 8 RHEL Program Management 2023-09-23 15:58:35 UTC
This BZ has been automatically migrated to the issues.redhat.com Red Hat Issue Tracker. All future work related to this report will be managed there.

Due to differences in account names between systems, some fields were not replicated.  Be sure to add yourself to Jira issue's "Watchers" field to continue receiving updates and add others to the "Need Info From" field to continue requesting information.

To find the migrated issue, look in the "Links" section for a direct link to the new issue location. The issue key will have an icon of 2 footprints next to it, and begin with "RHEL-" followed by an integer.  You can also find this issue by visiting https://issues.redhat.com/issues/?jql= and searching the "Bugzilla Bug" field for this BZ's number, e.g. a search like:

"Bugzilla Bug" = 1234567

In the event you have trouble locating or viewing this issue, you can file an issue by sending mail to rh-issues. You can also visit https://access.redhat.com/articles/7032570 for general account information.