Bug 200459 - clurgmgrd[9657]: <err> #34: Cannot get status for service nfs_service
Summary: clurgmgrd[9657]: <err> #34: Cannot get status for service nfs_service
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED DEFERRED
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Cluster Suite
Classification: Retired
Component: rgmanager
Version: 4
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Lon Hohberger
QA Contact: Cluster QE
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2006-07-27 20:12 UTC by Dean Jansa
Modified: 2009-04-16 20:20 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2006-12-05 16:04:09 UTC
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Dean Jansa 2006-07-27 20:12:27 UTC
Description of problem:

After a 'service rgmanager start' I noted several nodes did not start the
service successfully.  The logs on the failed nodes show:

Jul 27 12:56:34 morph-03 lock_gulmd_core[6337]: "Magma::9915" is logged out. fd:
Jul 27 12:56:20 morph-03 clurgmgrd[9657]: <err> #34: Cannot get status for service
Jul 27 12:56:20 morph-03 clurgmgrd[9657]: <err> #34: Cannot get status for
service nfs_service
Jul 27 12:56:21 morph-03 last message repeated 9 times


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

gulm-1.0.7-0
rgmanager-1.9.52-0

How reproducible:

Onec and a while.


Steps to Reproduce:
1. Define a rgmanager service
2. Start service on all nodes

  



Expected results:


Additional info:

Comment 1 Lon Hohberger 2006-07-27 20:16:38 UTC
This is a bug with the way rgmanager works, not with gulm itself.  Basically,
gulm has no service group support, so rgmanager thinks rgmanager is running on
all nodes at all times, which is incorrect.  Under most situations, this should
not matter, but in this case, there is apparently a race causing rgmanager to
break.  Restarting rgmanager on the affected node should fix the problem.

Comment 2 Kiersten (Kerri) Anderson 2006-09-22 18:53:29 UTC
Devel ACK for 4.5.

Comment 3 Lon Hohberger 2006-12-05 16:04:09 UTC
This bug:

- is gulm-specific
- has a workaround (but a poor one)
- has had no customer impact or reports
- would require a large change to rgmanager.

I'm closing this until we get reports from customers; at which point, it will be
re-evaluated.  Normally I wouldn't do this, except for the fact that it would be
a fairly large change.  If I come up with a solution which has less impact, I
will reopen the bug as well.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.