Bug 2008203 - failures in the upstream test suite: PR ld/14207 and multiple TLS-related
Summary: failures in the upstream test suite: PR ld/14207 and multiple TLS-related
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED EOL
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: binutils
Version: 36
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Nick Clifton
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2021-09-27 15:06 UTC by Václav Kadlčík
Modified: 2023-05-25 19:36 UTC (History)
6 users (show)

Fixed In Version: binutils-2.37-15.fc36
Doc Type: No Doc Update
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2023-05-25 19:36:08 UTC
Type: Bug
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)
rpmbuild/BUILD/binutils-2.37/ld/ld.sum, compressed (13.62 KB, application/octet-stream)
2021-09-27 15:06 UTC, Václav Kadlčík
no flags Details
logs from binutils-2.37-14.fc36 (512.50 KB, application/octet-stream)
2021-10-13 11:54 UTC, Václav Kadlčík
no flags Details

Description Václav Kadlčík 2021-09-27 15:06:13 UTC
Created attachment 1826685 [details]
rpmbuild/BUILD/binutils-2.37/ld/ld.sum, compressed

Description of problem:

There are failures in upstream test suite when rebuilding binutils


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

binutils-2.37-13.fc36.x86_64


Steps to Reproduce:

1. koji download-build --arch=src binutils-2.37-13.fc36
2. dnf builddep -y binutils-2.37-13.fc36.src.rpm
3. rpm -ivh binutils-2.37-13.fc36.src.rpm
4. rpmbuild -bc rpmbuild/SPECS/binutils.spec
5. grep '^FAIL: ' rpmbuild/BUILD/binutils-2.37/ld/ld.sum


Actual results:

FAIL: TLS -fno-pic -shared
FAIL: TLS -fpic -shared transitions
FAIL: TLS descriptor -fpic -shared transitions
FAIL: PR ld/14207

Comment 2 Nick Clifton 2021-09-29 13:40:34 UTC
Sorry about that.  The fix for BZ #2004952 made a change to the linker which triggered these testsuite failures.

I have updated the tests so that they now cope with the linker's new behaviour.

Fixed in: binutils-2.37-14.fc36

Comment 3 Václav Kadlčík 2021-10-13 10:03:57 UTC
I'm looking at binutils-2.37-14.fc36. Those specific failures
are gone but there's a bunch of new ones:

ld.sum:FAIL: PR ld/12758
ld.sum:FAIL: PR ld/pr16846(1)
ld.sum:FAIL: PR ld/pr16846(2)
ld.sum:FAIL: PR ld/12760
ld.sum:FAIL: Build pr25618.so
ld.sum:FAIL: liblto-19.so
ld.sum:FAIL: PR ld/16746 (3)
ld.sum:FAIL: PR ld/16746 (4)
ld.sum:FAIL: PR ld/12365
ld.sum:FAIL: PR binutils/23460
ld.sum:FAIL: PR binutils/23460
ld.sum:FAIL: LTO 3 symbol
ld.sum:FAIL: PR ld/13183
ld.sum:FAIL: LTO 3a
ld.sum:FAIL: LTO 3c
ld.sum:FAIL: LTO 12a
ld.sum:FAIL: LTO 12b
ld.sum:FAIL: LTO 13
ld.sum:FAIL: LTO 14
ld.sum:FAIL: LTO 15
ld.sum:FAIL: PR ld/12942 (2)
ld.sum:FAIL: LTO 7
ld.sum:FAIL: Build pr20103c
ld.sum:FAIL: PR ld/20103 (-O2 -flto tmpdir/thinpr20103a.a tmpdir/thinpr20103b.a tmpdir/thinpr20103c.a) (1)
ld.sum:FAIL: PR ld/20103 (-O2 -flto tmpdir/fatpr20103a.a tmpdir/fatpr20103b.a tmpdir/fatpr20103c.a) (1)
ld.sum:FAIL: PR ld/20103 (-O2 tmpdir/fatpr20103a.a tmpdir/fatpr20103b.a tmpdir/fatpr20103c.a) (1)
ld.sum:FAIL: Build pr20103d
ld.sum:FAIL: PR ld/20103

Nick, would you like to have a new ticket for them
or do you prefer to continue here?

Comment 4 Nick Clifton 2021-10-13 11:48:16 UTC
(In reply to Václav Kadlčík from comment #3)
> I'm looking at binutils-2.37-14.fc36. Those specific failures
> are gone but there's a bunch of new ones:

I assume that these are for all hosts, not just one specific host ?
I will investigate...

> Nick, would you like to have a new ticket for them
> or do you prefer to continue here?

No, let's continue here...

Comment 5 Václav Kadlčík 2021-10-13 11:53:22 UTC
(In reply to Nick Clifton from comment #4)
> (In reply to Václav Kadlčík from comment #3)
> > I'm looking at binutils-2.37-14.fc36. Those specific failures
> > are gone but there's a bunch of new ones:
> 
> I assume that these are for all hosts, not just one specific host ?
> I will investigate...

Looks quite reproducible. First I ran into it in:

  https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/binutils/pull-request/31

Then I created a Rawhide VM, tried manually and got the same.

> > Nick, would you like to have a new ticket for them
> > or do you prefer to continue here?
> 
> No, let's continue here...

OK, I'll attach the logs from the VM

Comment 6 Václav Kadlčík 2021-10-13 11:54:17 UTC
Created attachment 1832569 [details]
logs from binutils-2.37-14.fc36

Comment 7 Nick Clifton 2021-10-13 15:33:47 UTC
Should be fixed in binutils-2.37-15.fc36

Comment 8 Václav Kadlčík 2021-10-14 08:07:07 UTC
Yes, binutils-2.37-15.fc36 fixes all the FAILs above, thanks!

Comment 9 Ben Cotton 2022-02-08 21:37:20 UTC
This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 36 development cycle.
Changing version to 36.

Comment 10 Ben Cotton 2023-04-25 18:27:14 UTC
This message is a reminder that Fedora Linux 36 is nearing its end of life.
Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora Linux 36 on 2023-05-16.
It is Fedora's policy to close all bug reports from releases that are no longer
maintained. At that time this bug will be closed as EOL if it remains open with a
'version' of '36'.

Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you
plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, change the 'version' 
to a later Fedora Linux version. Note that the version field may be hidden.
Click the "Show advanced fields" button if you do not see it.

Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we were not 
able to fix it before Fedora Linux 36 is end of life. If you would still like 
to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it against a later version 
of Fedora Linux, you are encouraged to change the 'version' to a later version
prior to this bug being closed.

Comment 11 Ludek Smid 2023-05-25 19:36:08 UTC
Fedora Linux 36 entered end-of-life (EOL) status on 2023-05-16.

Fedora Linux 36 is no longer maintained, which means that it
will not receive any further security or bug fix updates. As a result we
are closing this bug.

If you can reproduce this bug against a currently maintained version of Fedora Linux
please feel free to reopen this bug against that version. Note that the version
field may be hidden. Click the "Show advanced fields" button if you do not see
the version field.

If you are unable to reopen this bug, please file a new report against an
active release.

Thank you for reporting this bug and we are sorry it could not be fixed.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.